Oil refineries challenge Tenth Circuit Court ruling on SREs

March 24, 2020

BY Erin Krueger

Wynnewood Refining and HollyFrontier filed petitions with the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals March 24 requesting a rehearing en banc of the court’s Jan. 24 ruling that struck down three small refinery exemptions (SREs) approved by the U.S. EPA.

The court’s Jan. 24 ruling, if implemented nationally, would significantly lower the number of small refineries that are eligible to apply for exemptions to their Renewable Fuel Standard blending requirements. This is because the court ruled that the EPA cannot extend exemptions to any small refineries whose earlier, temporary exemptions had lapsed. The court also found that the EPA abused its discretion in failing to explain how the agency could concluded that a small refinery might suffer a disproportionate economic hardship when the agency has simultaneously consistently maintained that costs for renewable identification numbers (RINs) are passed through and recovered by those same refineries.

The lawsuit challenging the EPA’s approval of the three SREs was filed in May 2018 by the Renewable Fuels Association, American Coalition for Ethanol, National Corn Growers Association, and National Farmers Union. The Jan. 24 decision was handed down by a unanimous panel of three judges. The petitions for a rehearing en banc request that the decision be reconsidered by the entire Tenth Circuit Court.

Advertisement

In its petition challenging the court’s decision, Wynnewood Refining Co. LLC argues that the court’s Jan. 24 decision that states small refineries must consistently receive exemptions from the RFS in all prior years to be eligible for SREs “contradicts the language and structure of the statute.” Rather, Wynnewood argues that the statute allows small refineries to petition exemptions “at any time” from escalating RFS requirements. The petition also references RIN prices, claiming the court’s decision would force 12 Tenth Circuit refineries out of business, and questions whether the coalition of biofuel groups that filed the original lawsuit had standing to sue. The petition field by HollyFrontier Cheyenne Refining LLC, HollyFrontier Refining and Marketing LLC, and HollyFrontier Woods Cross Refining LLC makes similar arguments.

 

Advertisement

Related Stories

The U.S. EPA on July 8 hosted virtual public hearing to gather input on the agency’s recently released proposed rule to set 2026 and 2027 RFS RVOs. Members of the biofuel industry were among those to offer testimony during the event.

Read More

The USDA’s Risk Management Agency is implementing multiple changes to the Camelina pilot insurance program for the 2026 and succeeding crop years. The changes will expand coverage options and provide greater flexibility for producers.

Read More

President Trump on July 4 signed the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act.” The legislation extends and updates the 45Z credit and revives a tax credit benefiting small biodiesel producers but repeals several other bioenergy-related tax incentives.

Read More

CARB on June 27 announced amendments to the state’s LCFS regulations will take effect beginning on July 1. The amended regulations were approved by the agency in November 2024, but implementation was delayed due to regulatory clarity issues.

Read More

SAF Magazine and the Commercial Aviation Alternative Fuels Initiative announced the preliminary agenda for the North American SAF Conference and Expo, being held Sept. 22-24 at the Minneapolis Convention Center in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Read More

Upcoming Events

Sign up for our e-newsletter!

Advertisement

Advertisement