US EPA completes RFS anti-backsliding study, proposes no actions
June 1, 2020
BY Erin Krueger
The U.S. EPA issued a rulemaking May 29 proposing to determine that no additional appropriate fuel control measures are necessary to mitigate air quality impacts of required renewable fuel volumes under the Renewable Fuel Standard.
RFS regulations contained in the Clean Air Act require the EPA to complete an anti-backsliding study to determine if required RFS blending volumes adversely impact air quality as a result of changes in vehicle and engine emissions. After considering the results of the study, the agency is required to either promulgate fuel regulations to mitigate adverse impacts on air quality or determine that no such measures are necessary. The EPA is proposing the second option—stating that the agency has determined no such measures are necessary.
Advertisement
Advertisement
“EPA is proposing to determine that no additional fuel control measures are necessary because since 2017, EPA has been implementing the Tier 3 Motor Vehicle Emissions and Fuel Standards which are more stringent and reduce concentrations of ozone, PM2.5, NO2, and air toxics now and in the future,” said the agency in a notice posted to its website. “In making this determination, EPA considered the analyses performed for the Tier 3 rulemaking, as well as the anti-backsliding study.”
The EPA published a notice in February 2019 proposing a consent decree that would require the agency to complete the anti-backsliding study by March 30, 2020. At that time, the EPA said the proposed consent decree would partially resolve a lawsuit filed by the Sierra Club in 2017 that sought to compel completion of the study.
A 30-day public comment period on the proposed determination will open following the proposal’s publication in the Federal Register. Comments can be filed on www.regulations.gov under Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2020-0240.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Growth Energy issued a statement following the proposal’s publication stating that the anti-backsliding report side-steps the wide body of evidence supporting a clear scientific consensus around the clean air benefits of ethanol. Growth Energy also stressed the proposal rehashes outdated information while omitting critical data on the environmental advantages of low-carbon biofuels.
“It’s disappointing to see this EPA miss another chance to correct outdated claims which minimize contributions of U.S. biofuels to clean air and a healthy climate,” said Emily Skor, CEO of Growth Energy. “The Renewable Fuel Standard has stood the test of time as America’s single most successful clean energy policy …”
Additional information is available on the EPA website.
Related Stories
The U.S. EPA on July 8 hosted virtual public hearing to gather input on the agency’s recently released proposed rule to set 2026 and 2027 RFS RVOs. Members of the biofuel industry were among those to offer testimony during the event.
The USDA’s Risk Management Agency is implementing multiple changes to the Camelina pilot insurance program for the 2026 and succeeding crop years. The changes will expand coverage options and provide greater flexibility for producers.
President Trump on July 4 signed the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act.” The legislation extends and updates the 45Z credit and revives a tax credit benefiting small biodiesel producers but repeals several other bioenergy-related tax incentives.
CARB on June 27 announced amendments to the state’s LCFS regulations will take effect beginning on July 1. The amended regulations were approved by the agency in November 2024, but implementation was delayed due to regulatory clarity issues.
SAF Magazine and the Commercial Aviation Alternative Fuels Initiative announced the preliminary agenda for the North American SAF Conference and Expo, being held Sept. 22-24 at the Minneapolis Convention Center in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Upcoming Events
