UC Davis report addresses compliance costs of California's LCFS

December 30, 2013

BY Erin Voegele

A recent report authored by two University of California, Davis researchers examines the economics of the California low carbon fuel standard (LCFS) program. According to information released by the UC Davis Institute of Transportation Studies, the report found that compliance costs for the LCFS could increase rapidly in the future if there are large differences in marginal costs between traditional fuels and low-carbon fuels. Compliance costs could also increase rapidly due to capacity or technology constraints associated with deploying low-carbon fuels.

Within the report, the authors discuss issues related to future costs of the LCFS and address provisions designed to keep compliance costs at reasonable levels. The analysis also addresses concerns over market power in the California fuel and credit markets, the role of dynamics and uncertainty on market outcomes, and incentives to innovate and invest in renewable fuels and their potential interactions with cost containment mechanisms.

Advertisement

According to the authors, high margins costs of low carbon intensity fuels and technology and capacity constraints are the largest sources of potential compliance cost increases as the LCFS becomes more stringent. They also note that technology constraints associated with deploying low carbon intensity fuels can lead to volatile LCFS credit prices.

In addition, the analysis determined that anticipated future costs will affect current LCFS credit prices. This is related to the ability of obligated parties to bank credits now for future compliance needs. The authors also note that expectations matter. Considering the high degree of uncertainty regarding the future availability of low carbon intensity fuels, the authors note that high expected compliance costs can increase current compliance costs substantially.

The report also includes several recommendations regarding cost compliance mechanisms. First, the authors say the California Air Resources Board should institute a cost containment measure that puts a hard cap on LCFS credit prices. The report also suggests that CARB counteract decreases in incentives to invest in low carbon intensity fuels by directly investing funds raised through a cost containment mechanism in these fuels. Furthermore, the authors point out that while low carbon intensity credit multipliers can reduce compliance costs, they may also decrease incentives to invest in low carbon intensity fuels and to not guarantee that compliance costs will be contained. Finally, the report finds that instituting a price floor for LCFS credit prices could send a clearer price signal to investors in low carbon intensity fuels.

Advertisement

The paper, titled “A Report on the Economics of California’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard and Cost Containment Mechanisms,” was authored by UC Davis researchers Gabriel E. Lade and C.Y. Cynthia Lin. A fully copy of the report can be downloaded from the UC Davis ITS website.

 

 

Related Stories

Reps. Zach Nunn, R-Iowa, and Nikki Budzinski, D-Ill., on May 7 introduced a bill that aims to update USDA’s Section 9003 program to expand access to grants, streamline loan guarantees and provide $100 million in mandatory funding over five years.

Read More

The Canadian International Trade Tribunal on May 5 announced that a preliminary investigation launched earlier this year did not find evidence that imports of U.S. renewable diesel are causing harm to Canada’s domestic renewable diesel industry.

Read More

Reps. Mike Carey, R-Ohio, and Mariannette Miller-Meeks, R-Iowa, on May 1 introduced legislation that aims to retroactively extend the biodiesel blenders tax credit (BTC) and the second-generation biofuel producer tax credit.

Read More

A broad coalition representing more than 350 trucking fleets, shippers, and supporters of freight movement is urging Congress to extend the biodiesel blenders’ tax credit to lower supply chain costs and protect consumers from inflationary pressures.

Read More

The Oregon DEQ has confirmed that the 2024 annual report deadline for the state’s Clean Fuels Program will be delayed until May 30 due to a cyberattack the resulted in an extended outage of the Oregon Fuels Reporting System.

Read More

Upcoming Events

Sign up for our e-newsletter!

Advertisement

Advertisement