Print

Coming Off Record Year, RFS Proposal Poses Significant Challenge

EPA's proposal to keep the biomass-based diesel RFS standard at 1.28 billion gallons has potential to do serious damage to the industry, and the NBB needs your help. We will not be successful without vocal and aggressive outreach from stakeholders.
By Joe Jobe | January 10, 2014

The biodiesel industry has faced its share of challenges. If you have been around the industry very long, you might say we have faced more than our fair share. But one thing is certain, when we face challenges, even if they seem monumental, we come together and we succeed. 

We are officially on the clock for what may be our biggest challenge faced to date. On Nov. 29, the EPA formally published its proposed rule for 2014 and 2015 biodiesel volumes under the RFS. This started the 60-day comment period and sets a deadline of Jan. 28 to make our voices heard on this damaging proposal.

The U.S. biodiesel industry is the leading producer of EPA-designated advanced biofuel, and the first to break 1 billion gallons of annual production. With commercial-scale refineries across the country, the industry has exceeded RFS requirements in each year of the program including 2013 with an all-time record production estimated at 1.7 billion gallons. Biodiesel is a clear RFS success story and the industry is calling on the EPA to support a modest increase in the proposal that is consistent with actual, real-world production.

The EPA’s proposed rule for next year would set biodiesel volumes at 1.28 billion gallons while shrinking the overall advanced biofuel requirement to 2.2 billion gallons. Additionally, because excess biodiesel production in 2013 can be carried over for compliance into 2014, the 1.28 billion gallon proposal for 2014 could mean an effective market closer to 1 billion gallons—a dramatic reduction from current production levels.

Because this proposal has the potential to do serious damage to the industry, we are doing everything we can, but we need your help. We will not be successful without vocal and aggressive outreach from the industry. We have set a goal of submitting at least 5,000 letters supporting an increased biodiesel volume above the 1.28 billion gallon proposal. We have made it easy by embedding a form letter at the Fueling Action Letter Writing Campaign page linked from the homepage of www.biodiesel.org. The message can be edited to include your personal story, or it can be sent as is. It can be sent throughout your social media networks, shared with friends and family during the holidays, or left open on a computer in the break room for employees to send directly from your facility. 

Along with a high volume of letters, we know that a wide variety of individual letters from stakeholders is extremely important. We urge you to customize letters to discuss the specific impacts lower biodiesel production numbers will have on your business, job, or organization. You can use the template letter online and submit just by clicking “Send,” or you can use one of the following methods to send it manually. If sending manually, be sure to direct your submission to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0479:

• Submit via email to a-and-r-docket@epa.gov; Mccarthy.gina@epa.gov;
  HShelanski@omb.eop.gov; dmancini@omb.eop.gov; oecc@who.eop.gov; agsec@usda.gov.
• Submit electronically from www.regulations.gov and searchfor Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0479.
  You will seea link for Renewable Fuel Standard Program; 2014 Standards and click the “Comment
  Now” link on the righthand side.
• Submit via mail to Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center, Environmental Protection
  Agency, Mailcode: 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460.

We would like to be able to track our progress throughout the 60-day comment period so if you do send a letter, or your friends submit 50 letters, please let Ben Evans know at bevans@biodiesel.org.

Another tactic that we know will be crucial to the effort is to have senators and representatives weigh in with the EPA and the administration on behalf of the industry. In November, we saw a bipartisan group of 32 senators sign a letter urging administration support led by industry champions Sens. Franken, Blunt, Murray and Grassley. On the House side, Reps. Mike McIntyre and Tom Latham circulated a similar support letter that was sent to the administration in December. We know that this show of support from Congress has made an impact, and the administration needs to continue hearing from them throughout the process. This type of political pressure will be key, so everyone needs to pick up the phone, call their senators and representatives, and urge them to reach out to the administration and EPA over the next several months. 

Nearly two dozen NBB members and staff testified at a marathon EPA hearing Dec. 5 on the volume proposal. Of the more than 150 people who spoke during the 12-hour hearing, nearly every panel had a biodiesel industry representative on it. EPA clearly heard the effects the proposed rule would have if finalized during the hearing, and I want to thank all of those who participated. 

Since the proposed rule has come out, NBB staff and members have conducted a series of meetings with top EPA officials, the White House’s Office of Management and Budget, the White House’s office on Energy and Climate Change, USDA Secretary Tom Vilsack, and countless senators and representatives.

While getting this proposed rule changed seems like a monumental task, it is one that we must do as an industry. We must continue the growth of advanced biofuels, the reduction in emissions, and the growth in economic activity in cities and towns across the country. Our more than a billion gallons of production each of the past three years has been a real success story for the RFS, and EPA needs to hear from you that a reduction to America’s advanced biofuel is a step in the wrong direction.

Joe Jobe,
CEO, National Biodiesel Board

 

3 Responses

  1. Bruce Griffin

    2014-01-11

    1

    Well said Joe we all need to act.

  2. Peter Brown

    2014-01-19

    2

    Joe, with all due respect, this may be a little late in the game. The time to hammer at the door was when BP was fouling the Gulf or when Exxon was dumping crude in Alaska. Another good time was when they were dicking around with the dollar rebate or allowing BP to pump $50 million into Berkeley for the hatchet job of Platzek Pimentel. It is hard to react from a supine position and only when the destruction of our industry has been allowed to go on for so long unchecked. I will and I have gone after the EPA on several occasions and will continue to deal with the petroleum industry for the thugs that they are and I will continue to root for the NBB and the magazine, but it is seriously time to remove the gloves, aim lower than their belts and ignore Queensbury. Clearly we are dealing with more than just a shy little EPA organization, we are dealing with a band of happy hookers, lead by the petroleum johns and bought for by the politicians.

  3. Peter Brown

    2014-01-22

    3

    Joe, for financial reasons was unable to be at NBB this year. Heard about the speech you made this morning, thank you it was time. Those illegitimate sons of oil sodden bottom feeders and befoulers deserve to be reined in sharply and with no consideration. Maintain the pressure and we will be behind or in front of you. PB

  4.  

    Leave a Reply

    Biodiesel Magazine encourages civil conversation and debate. However, comments containing personal attacks, profanity, business solicitations or other advertising will be deleted.

    Comments are closed

 
Array ( [PATH] => /sbin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin [PP_CUSTOM_PHP_INI] => /var/www/vhosts/biodieselmagazine.com/etc/php.ini [FCGI_ROLE] => RESPONDER [REDIRECT_REDIRECT_PP_CUSTOM_PHP_INI] => /var/www/vhosts/biodieselmagazine.com/etc/php.ini [REDIRECT_REDIRECT_STATUS] => 200 [REDIRECT_PP_CUSTOM_PHP_INI] => /var/www/vhosts/biodieselmagazine.com/etc/php.ini [REDIRECT_STATUS] => 200 [HTTP_HOST] => biodieselmagazine.com [HTTP_X_REAL_IP] => 50.17.177.99 [HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR] => 50.17.177.99 [HTTP_X_ACCEL_INTERNAL] => /internal-nginx-static-location [HTTP_CONNECTION] => close [HTTP_ACCEPT_ENCODING] => x-gzip, gzip, deflate [HTTP_USER_AGENT] => CCBot/2.0 (http://commoncrawl.org/faq/) [HTTP_ACCEPT_LANGUAGE] => en-us,en-gb,en;q=0.7,*;q=0.3 [HTTP_ACCEPT] => text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8 [SERVER_SIGNATURE] =>
Apache Server at biodieselmagazine.com Port 80
[SERVER_SOFTWARE] => Apache [SERVER_NAME] => biodieselmagazine.com [SERVER_ADDR] => 64.207.180.117 [SERVER_PORT] => 80 [REMOTE_ADDR] => 50.17.177.99 [DOCUMENT_ROOT] => /var/www/vhosts/directory.biodieselmagazine.com/httpdocs/biodieselmagazine.com [SERVER_ADMIN] => jkeller@bbiinternational.com [SCRIPT_FILENAME] => /var/www/vhosts/directory.biodieselmagazine.com/httpdocs/biodieselmagazine.com/app/webroot/index.php [REMOTE_PORT] => 37248 [REDIRECT_QUERY_STRING] => url=articles/9490/coming-off-record-year-rfs-proposal-poses-significant-challenge [REDIRECT_URL] => /app/webroot/articles/9490/coming-off-record-year-rfs-proposal-poses-significant-challenge [GATEWAY_INTERFACE] => CGI/1.1 [SERVER_PROTOCOL] => HTTP/1.0 [REQUEST_METHOD] => GET [QUERY_STRING] => url=articles/9490/coming-off-record-year-rfs-proposal-poses-significant-challenge [REQUEST_URI] => /articles/9490/coming-off-record-year-rfs-proposal-poses-significant-challenge [SCRIPT_NAME] => /app/webroot/index.php [PHP_SELF] => /app/webroot/index.php [REQUEST_TIME] => 1409692492 )