2012 global biodiesel production rises slightly

While overall global biofuel production fell in 2012 for the first time since 2000, biodiesel production rose slightly, according to a recent Worldwatch Institute report.
By Ron Kotrba | April 15, 2014

A new Worldwatch Institute analysis examines the trends in global biofuel production. Here is the organization's press release about its report (with parenthetical liter-to-gallon conversions).

In 2012, the combined global production of ethanol and biodiesel fell for the first time since 2000, down 0.4 percent from the figure in 2011. Global ethanol production declined slightly for the second year in a row, to 83.1 billion liters (approximately 22 billion gallons), while biodiesel output rose fractionally, from 22.4 billion liters (5.9 billion gallons) in 2011 to 22.5 billion liters (5.94 billion gallons) in 2012. Biodiesel now accounts for more than 20 percent of global biofuel production, writes Tom Prugh in the Worldwatch Institute’s latest Vital Signs Online trend.

Biofuels are a subset of bioenergy, which is energy derived from biomass (plant and animal matter) and which can range from manually gathered fuelwood and animal dung to industrially processed forms such as ethanol and biodiesel. Biomass can be used directly for heat, turned into biogas to produce electricity, or processed into liquid forms suitable as alternatives or supplements to fossil fuels for transport.

Bioenergy is regionally or locally important in many places around the world; traditional biomass is still used for cooking by 38 percent of people worldwide, for example, while in parts of Africa and Asia more than 90 percent of the populace relies on it. In China and elsewhere in Asia, roughly 48 million biogas plants were built as of 2012 to support rural electrification.

The top five ethanol producers in 2012 were the U.S., Brazil, China, Canada, and France. But the U.S. and Brazil accounted for 87 percent (61 percent and 26 percent, respectively) of the global total.

U.S. ethanol production totaled 50.4 billion liters (13.3 billion gallons), down about 4 percent from 2011; U.S. production depends mainly on corn as a feedstock, and corn prices rose in 2012 due to a severe summer drought in the Midwest. As a result, in the fall the U.S. briefly became a net importer of ethanol after nearly three uninterrupted years of net exports. Brazil’s production rose 3 percent to 21.6 billion liters (5.7 billion gallons), partly because of a drop in sugar prices. The other top producers account for far smaller volumes; China’s output, for instance, totaled 2.1 billion liters (more than 550 million gallons) in 2012, while Canada’s totaled 1.8 billion liters (more than 475 million gallons). The European Union (EU) as a whole produced 4.6 billion liters (1.21 billion gallons) of fuel ethanol in 2012.

The U.S. also led in biodiesel production, with 3.6 billion liters (950 million gallons), while Argentina took second place with 2.8 billion liters (nearly 740 million gallons), and Germany and Brazil had roughly the same output at 2.7 billion liters (more than 710 million gallons) apiece. China’s biodiesel production, at only 200 million liters (nearly 53 million gallons) in 2012, lags far behind its output of fuel ethanol. Several European nations produce biodiesel, and the EU as a whole still accounted for 41 percent of global biodiesel output despite a decline of 7 percent in 2012. Worldwide, biodiesel production grew at an average annual rate of 17 percent from 2007 through 2012, although the rate of growth slowed considerably.

Biofuel demand is strongly driven by blending mandates and supported by subsidies. Seventy-six states, provinces, or countries had such mandates on the books in 2012, up from 72 the previous year. Global subsidies for liquid biofuels were estimated in 2012 to be well over $20 billion. Mandates or targets have been established in 13 countries in the Americas, 12 in the Asia-Pacific region, and eight in Africa. In Europe, the EU-27 group of countries is subject to a Renewable Energy Directive that called for 5.75 percent biofuel content in transportation fuels in 2012. The U.S. and China have established—and Brazil has already achieved—targets of between 15 and 20 percent no later than 2022; India has also mandated 20 percent ethanol by 2017.

Whether these targets are stable and will be met is an open question, however. India, for example, is said to have an uneven record of meeting its own mandates. The EU’s RED came under strong challenge in 2012 as a result of concerns over the effect that biofuel feedstock cultivation was having on food prices and changes in land use. In response, the European Commission proposed limiting conventional biofuels (those derived from food crops) to a 5 percent share of all transport fuels.

Further highlights from the report:

-Biofuels for transport, essentially ethanol and biodiesel, account for about 0.8 percent of global energy use, 8 percent of global primary energy derived from biomass, 3.4 percent of global road transport fuels, and 2.5 percent of all transport fuels.

-In the U.S., the EPA’s mandate that petroleum refineries buy nearly 33 million liters (8.7 million gallons) of advanced cellulosic biofuels for blending in 2012 was thwarted by underproduction: less than 76,000 liters (20,000 gallons) was produced that year.

-Global investment in biofuels equaled about $5 billion in 2012, down 40 percent from 2011; $3.8 billion of this was in industrial nations and $1.2 billion in developing ones.

-Biofuels investment within the Group of Twenty (G-20) nations has declined every year from 2007 through 2012. Despite this trend, some observers expect biofuel investment to rise; one forecast, for example, put 2023 revenues at $7.6 billion on investment of $69 billion over the decade, supported by continued blending mandates.

1 Responses

  1. Roman



    2013 was another record and 2014 will be as well (tax credit and RFS-2 cooperating of course)

  2. Leave a Reply

    Biodiesel Magazine encourages civil conversation and debate. However, we reserve the right to delete comments for reasons including but not limited to: any type of attack, injurious statements, profanity, business solicitations or other advertising.

    Comments are closed