DOJ must maintain integrity of RFS, reject PES settlement

March 27, 2018

BY The National Biodiesel Board

The National Biodiesel Board called on the Department of Justice to reconsider its proposed settlement allowing PES Holdings to escape the vast majority of its 2016-’17 obligations under the Renewable Fuel Standard. The proposed settlement would harm the renewable fuels industry and undermine the intent of the RFS program by excusing more than 70 percent of the company’s compliance obligations for the two-year period.

“While PES continues to blame the RFS for its woes, the fact is, the bankruptcy is a mess of its own making,” said Kurt Kovarik, NBB’s vice president of federal affairs. “Poor management and a failure to respond to changes in the crude oil market is to blame. PES should not be rewarded for deliberately failing to comply with the decade-old Renewable Fuel Standard. Doing so is akin to rewarding a toddler in the midst of a temper tantrum. Instead, the government should hold PES to the same renewable volume obligation as all other refiners. Not doing so could severely hinder the RFS’s goals of enhancing energy security, protecting the environment and building our nation’s rural economy.”       

NBB highlighted two key components in comments to the DOJ submitted March 26. First, the RFS holds parent companies liable for the compliance obligations of their subsidiaries. Thus, PES’s corporate parents Carlyle and Sunoco can be required to comply with the RFS obligations incurred by PES. EPA has not explained why it is abandoning that avenue for ensuring complete fulfillment of PES’s obligations. Second, the renewable volume obligations (RVOs) under the RFS cannot be discharged in bankruptcy. The RFS creates an affirmative duty for obligated parties to blend or use biofuels or to buy credits from others who have done so. Such a duty persists through the bankruptcy because it cannot be resolved by a payment to the government.

Advertisement

Advertisement

“At the very least, a finalized settlement should require PES or its parent companies to comply with a far greater share of its RVOs,” Kovarik said. “The RFS is working to drive billions of gallons of cleaner-burning advanced biofuels and thousands of jobs throughout the country, and its integrity should not be undermined.”

 

Advertisement

Advertisement

Related Stories

The U.S. EPA on July 8 hosted virtual public hearing to gather input on the agency’s recently released proposed rule to set 2026 and 2027 RFS RVOs. Members of the biofuel industry were among those to offer testimony during the event.

Read More

The USDA’s Risk Management Agency is implementing multiple changes to the Camelina pilot insurance program for the 2026 and succeeding crop years. The changes will expand coverage options and provide greater flexibility for producers.

Read More

President Trump on July 4 signed the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act.” The legislation extends and updates the 45Z credit and revives a tax credit benefiting small biodiesel producers but repeals several other bioenergy-related tax incentives.

Read More

CARB on June 27 announced amendments to the state’s LCFS regulations will take effect beginning on July 1. The amended regulations were approved by the agency in November 2024, but implementation was delayed due to regulatory clarity issues.

Read More

SAF Magazine and the Commercial Aviation Alternative Fuels Initiative announced the preliminary agenda for the North American SAF Conference and Expo, being held Sept. 22-24 at the Minneapolis Convention Center in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Read More

Upcoming Events

Sign up for our e-newsletter!

Advertisement

Advertisement