The biodiesel industry has long been considered limited in growth on many fronts, a major one being the amount of available fats, oils and greases (FOG) to produce the fuel. Detractors use this to marginalize biodiesel to merely a diesel fuel additive rather than a blend stock or replacement alternative for diesel. Their argument is, as biodiesel grows, feedstock markets become tight and prices rise, causing production to be uneconomical while affecting other markets relying on FOG. But in 2013, we witnessed an interesting phenomenon, as U.S. biodiesel and renewable diesel production soared to a record-shattering 1.8 billion gallons. Moreover, in the latter half of the year, the U.S. was producing biomass-based diesel at an annualized run rate of closer to 2.4 billion gallons, an impressive accomplishment for an industry that struggled just three years ago to produce 315 million gallons. Instead of this applying upward pressure on feedstock prices, however, we saw feedstock prices go down.
 In our featured article on page 20, &ldquo;The Myth &amp; Reality of Biodiesel Feedstock Availability,&rdquo; several important points are made. One is that the commercial development of next-generation feedstocks will not be realized unless industries, in this case, biodiesel, continue to demand supplies of first-generation feedstocks. As Gene Gebolys, founder of World Energy Alternatives and chair of the National Biodiesel Board&rsquo;s RFS working group, tells me, &ldquo;There are folks out there who want to make innovation in feedstock the enemy of our current capabilities, and that&rsquo;s really foolish,&rdquo; he says. &ldquo;There&rsquo;s a lot of talk about foregoing first-generation biofuels for next-generation biofuels, and the most certain way to kill next-generation biofuels is to take a pause in current-generation biofuels.&rdquo; Another takeaway message from the article is that the biodiesel industry has come nowhere near its limits in terms of how much FOG it can absorb in order to grow in a responsible, sustainable manner.
 Our feedstock coverage doesn&rsquo;t stop there though. In &ldquo;Time Has Come Today,&rdquo; on page 26, we discuss the decision-making process of pioneers in the ethanol sector who have pulled the trigger on contracting with biodiesel technology providers to manufacture biodiesel from their distillers corn oil on site. Also, NBB&rsquo;s Don Scott and Alan Weber author this issue&rsquo;s Talking Point column, &ldquo;A True Masterpiece: Feedstock Diversity and Biodiesel&rsquo;s Carbon Story,&rdquo; on page 7.&nbsp; Fredrikson &amp; Byron&rsquo;s Todd Taylor also hits our feedstock theme with his Legal Perspective column, &ldquo;Sustainable Feedstock Contracts,&rdquo; on page 6. Finally, Erik Anderson with Superior Process Technologies discusses glycerolysis of low-cost feedstocks in &ldquo;The Chemical Kinetics of Glycerolysis,&rdquo; on page 32. Thanks to all of our contributing writers&mdash;and our advertisers&mdash;for making this issue possible!

2014/05/EDNOTE-BRM-ron-1110_14000860752062.jpg

THE FEEDSTOCK  ISSUE

If you are a biodiesel producer, you already believe in sustainability and taking care of our natural resources. You already have your renewable fuel standard (RFS) pathway and are making the best biodiesel you can while trying to make the highest profit possible. Sustainability is part of your DNA, but is it part of your feedstock contracts?
Sustainability in biodiesel feedstock contracts means many things. Historically, it has meant simply buying feedstock that allows for the resulting biodiesel to qualify for a renewable identification number (RIN) under the RFS. Increasingly, however, sustainabilty is starting to be looked at more broadly, and biodiesel companies need to be aware of the specifics of what makes a feedstock and fuel sustainable.
When it comes to establishing a pathway for biodiesel, feedstock is key. The &ldquo;better&rdquo; the feedstock, the lower the carbon score and, thus, the more you can get paid for your biodiesel. This is especially true in California under the low carbon fuel standard (LCFS) where a lower carbon score means more money.
So what does sustainability mean for a feedstock contract? In its 1987 report, &ldquo;Our Common Future,&rdquo; The United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development defines sustainable development as &ldquo;Development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.&rdquo;
The Sustainable Biodiesel Alliance even has defined sustainable biodiesel: &ldquo;Sustainable biodiesel is biodiesel that is produced in a manner that, on a life-cycle basis, minimizes the generation of pollution, including greenhouse gases; reduces competition for, and use of, natural resources and energy; reduces waste generation; preserves habitat and ecosystems; maintains or improves soils; avoids use of genetically modified organisms; and provides community economic benefit that results in jobs and fair labor conditions.&rdquo;
Note that the definition above is mostly focused on feedstock-related issues, rather than production technology issues. Tilling, irrigation, fertilizer use, GMOs, even transportation distances between feedstock supplier and biodiesel plant, are all critical elements, and each can be part of an offtake contract you may be facing in the future. While not common, there are already contracts with provisions related to sustainability in offtake agreements being signed with major strategic partners. While most sustainability provisions are voluntarily adopted in the U.S., this may change as customers push for sustainability, and regulators on a state and federal level increasingly pull; and in Europe and parts of Asia, sustainability is part of the legal landscape. Biodiesel producers selling biodiesel into foreign markets are already aware of the differences.
If a customer requires your biodiesel to be sustainable, you will need to require your feedstock providers to be sustainable. For biodiesel, the thought of requiring your farmers to sign feedstock contracts is very odd. Besides the fact that your customers may require your biodiesel to be sustainable, sustainability is really about good farming practices and a sense of connection to the land, and with the people who work that land. Working with your growers to be sustainable is ultimately good for everyone.
Contract provisions for your feedstock suppliers may include requirements to use farming methods that require lower use of fertilizers and pesticides, both of which can contribute to carbon emissions and soil degradation. Contracts could also impose sustainable crop rotation requirements to minimize loss of soil nutrients and maximize disease resistance. One common requirement is to not place marginally productive land, including but not necessarily limited to CRP land, in service in order to avoid releasing land-sequestered carbon. Other requirements are related to the supply chain and may demand use of low carbon emissions for on- and off-road vehicles in the farming and transportation of the feedstock, as well as placing maximum distances on hauling feedstocks.
Sustainability is part of the daily life of farmers and biodiesel producers. As the rest of the world adopts sustainability, biodiesel producers will have to address a host of new voluntary and potentially mandatory sustainability conditions as we all adapt to a changing world.
Author: Todd A. Taylor Attorney, Fredrikson &amp; Byron 612-492-7864 <a href="mailto:ttaylor@fredlaw.com">ttaylor@fredlaw.com</a>

2014/05/LP-Biodiesel-Taylor-0514_14000861801392_largethumb.jpg

2014/05/LP-Biodiesel-Taylor-0514_14000861801392_thumb.jpg

2014/05/LP-Biodiesel-Taylor-0514_14000861801392.jpg

If you are a biodiesel producer, you already believe in sustainability. You already have your RFS pathway and are making the best biodiesel and highest profits possible. Sustainability is part of your DNA, but is it part of your feedstock contracts? 

Sustainable Feedstock Contracts

Although neither of us could be considered an expert judge of art, the mosaic of biodiesel feedstocks could be considered one of the more colorful pieces of artwork, if not a masterpiece, within the biofuels arena. This diversity has been a strength as biodiesel producers utilize an extensive pallet of feedstocks. These include recycled cooking oil, vegetable oils such as soybean and canola oil, animal fats, and other byproducts such as distillers corn oil (DCO).
The benefits of this diversity are far from abstract. When a significant portion of the U.S. experienced dry growing conditions in 2012, the diversity and abundance of available feedstocks for biodiesel production helped alleviate supply concerns. Also, the use of DCO has added to the profitability of ethanol production. Increased domestic use of animal fats and used cooking oil in 2013 has helped offset reduced exports for the rendering industry. All together, this diverse feedstock supply enabled the biodiesel and renewable diesel industries to grow to 1.8 billion gallons in 2013.
In this picture, an impressive example of growth is that of DCO. An inedible byproduct of ethanol production, DCO flourished as a result of thriving ethanol processing and the economic incentive to extract the oil for biodiesel manufacturing. We saw 62 percent growth in this product for biodiesel in 2013, and 105 percent growth in 2012. This equates to more than 250 million gallons of biodiesel since 2011.
DCO shows that innovation will find economic solutions when public policy values the environmental and social benefits of renewable fuels. But sometimes lost in the discussion is how improvements in technology and biodiesel&rsquo;s diversity have made biodiesel a very cost-effective technology in reducing carbon from the transportation sector and providing other environmental and social benefits. In 2013, U.S. consumption of biomass-based diesel resulted in the elimination of approximately 17.3 million metric tons of CO2&mdash;equivalent to the annual emissions from 3.6 million cars. Since 2011, biodiesel production costs have declined by 20 percent. At the same time, the biodiesel industry has significantly increased its use of low-carbon feedstocks derived from waste grease, animal fats, DCO and other ancillary agricultural products, which currently account for almost half of combined U.S. biodiesel and renewable diesel production. It&rsquo;s noteworthy that all of the feedstocks used to satisfy the renewable fuel standard (RFS) are decreasing in carbon intensity as the fossil fuels they displace are increasing in carbon intensity. Based on published life-cycle analysis and an average of 2013 feedstocks, the aggregate biodiesel industry currently reduces CO2 emissions by approximately 81 percent relative to average petroleum diesel, on an energy-equivalent basis.
Based on biodiesel&rsquo;s feedstocks and respective carbon life-cycle estimates, today&rsquo;s biodiesel eliminates CO2 emissions from petroleum-based diesel at a cost of $71 to $91 per metric ton. While environmental groups often cite that the social cost of carbon is indeed much higher, some government agencies accept this range to represent the value to society in terms of environmental and human health damages that will be incurred if we continue to use fossil fuels, or that can be saved if we reduce fossil carbon emissions. Current trends indicate that the cost of carbon reduction using biodiesel can be even lower in 2014.
Possibly the best part of the biodiesel landscape is that the RFS and other market factors will continue to drive innovation. Research investment will yield new technologies to contribute to low-carbon feedstock supplies such as camelina, field pennycress, brown greases, and let&rsquo;s not forget the amazing leaps that can be made with existing feedstocks. Our industry&rsquo;s feedstock masterpiece is never finished. Unlike a great work of art, the biodiesel industry&rsquo;s masterpiece will continue to evolve, with its beauty found in its diverse pallet.
Authors: Don Scott, Alan Weber The National Biodiesel Board 573-635-3893 <a href="mailto:dscott@biodiesel.org">dscott@biodiesel.org</a> <a href="mailto:aweber@marciv.com">aweber@marciv.com</a>

2014/05/TP-Biodiesel-Scott-0514_14000863317485_largethumb.jpg

2014/05/TP-Biodiesel-Scott-0514_14000863317485_thumb.jpg

2014/05/TP-Biodiesel-Scott-0514_14000863317485.jpg

2014/05/TP-Biodiesel-weber-0514_14000863374061.jpg

The mosaic of biodiesel feedstocks could be considered one of the more colorful pieces of artwork, if not a masterpiece, within the biofuels arena. This diversity has been a strength as biodiesel producers utilize an extensive pallet of feedstocks.

A True Masterpiece: Feedstock Diversity and Biodiesel's Carbon Story

Researchers from the University of Porto, Portugal, are looking at water-free methods to purify biodiesel.
The study involved heterogeneous transesterification using what the researchers say is a very active calcium glyceroxide catalyst followed by efforts to remove soaps through pretreating the crude biodiesel (methyl ester content of 90.2 to 91.2 percent by weight, and calcium content of 372 to 393 parts per million) with sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) and, afterward, running the fuel through ion exchange resins (6 percent by weight) or a ceramic membrane (0.1 &mu;m).
The purification was effective using biodiesel produced from both soybean and used cooking oils, and resulting fuel quality was comparable to that of conventional water-washing.
While dry-washing biodiesel is not uncommon, the researchers say the effectiveness of this treatment could be explained by calcium elimination through precipitation as calcium carbonate (CaCO3) during pretreatment, and sodium soaps removal by absorption into the resin or filtration by the ceramic membrane, according to the micelle formation mechanism. The researchers say the process &ldquo;presents a high potential to remove calcium soaps from biodiesel,&rdquo; and &ldquo;could provide significant economic and environmental benefits compared to other more energy intensive water-based production methods.&rdquo;
&ldquo;In some countries like Brazil, biofuels provide nearly a quarter of their road transport needs,&rdquo; says David Brown, the Institution of Chemical Engineers chief executive. &ldquo;In the European Union, negotiations are under way to increase biofuels for transport to 10 percent. And Indonesia&mdash;the world's largest producer of palm oil&mdash;has announced plans to increase biodiesel production to reduce its reliance on crude oil imports. Current production processes do not always deliver the full potential of biofuels to help reduce greenhouse gas emissions, however, and there are continuing challenges including economic and environmental. But demand for biofuels is clearly increasing and advancement in chemical engineering processes, such as the use of heterogeneous catalysis and water-free methods using membranes, are very welcome to consolidate biofuels as a globally accepted and sustainable source of renewable energy.&rdquo;

Portuguese researchers study alternative biodiesel processes

The Union zur F&ouml;rderung von Oel- und Proteinpflanzen (UFOP) reports that the sale of biodiesel declined drastically by 90 million gallons in 2013, according to information from the German Federal Office of Economics and Export Control (BAFA). During 2009-&rsquo;12, biodiesel sales averaged 750.5 million gallons. In 2013, the volume was only 660.5 million gallons.
UFOP says it has determined that the actual decline in vegetable methyl esters is much more dramatic because the BAFA data also includes the offset amount of hydrated vegetable oil (HVO) and biodiesel from waste oils. Assuming HVO sales of 126 million gallons and an estimated sale of up to 60 million gallons of waste-derived biodiesel, the actual sale of conventional biodiesel is only about 480.3 million gallons, UFOP states.
&ldquo;The consumption statistics spell out the significance of pure fuel marketing in the years 2007-&rsquo;08 and the total energy quota of 5.25 percent introduced in 2009, as well as its increase to 6.25 for the period 2010-&rsquo;14,&rdquo; UFOP says. &ldquo;However, with the resolution for the Biofuel Quota Act having been passed as a clear indication of political will, the UFOP has criticized that volume balancing for compensation of the incremental reduction in the tax concession&mdash;biodiesel has been subject to full taxation since 2013&mdash;will creep in due to the double apportionment of biofuels from waste oils and as a result of HVO imports.&rdquo;
While German biodiesel sales were down last year, the nation did set a biodiesel record in 2013. At around 480.3 million gallons (just under 1.6 million metric tons), the German biodiesel industry set a new export record last year, according to an appraisal by the Agricultural Market Information Co. based on BAFA data. The appraisal shows exports from Germany have risen by 20 percent, or roughly 105 million gallons, in comparison to the previous year. UFOP notes that, in the same period, biodiesel imports fell from 228.1 million gallons to 168.1 million gallons.
The UFOP states several reasons for this. The tariffs put on Argentine and Indonesian biodiesel are now showing their effect. Less than 2.25 million gallons of biodiesel was imported from Indonesia. UFOP also says the export balance &ldquo;confirmed the competitiveness of the German biodiesel industry and consequently its international marketing expertise.&rdquo; UFOP states that the U.S., with 54 million gallons, is its most important partner outside the EU.

2014/05/FE-Biodiesel-Germantrade-0514_14000865585182_largethumb.jpg

2014/05/FE-Biodiesel-Germantrade-0514_14000865585182_thumb.jpg

2014/05/FE-Biodiesel-Germantrade-0514_14000865585182.jpg

2013 a mixed year for German biodiesel

The global market for specialty fuel additives is expected to reach $8.5 billion by 2020, according to a new report, titled, &ldquo;Specialty Fuel Additives Market Analysis and Segment Forecasts to 2020,&rdquo; by Grand View Research Inc. Cold flow improvers are expected to be the fastest growing product segment, the report finds, with an estimated compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 7.9 percent from 2014 to 2020.
&ldquo;Positive outlook on biodiesel demand, especially in regional markets of North America and Europe, is expected to boost cold flow improver sales over the next six years,&rdquo; Grand View Research states. &ldquo;The global demand for cetane improvers is projected to reach 209.6 kilotons by 2020, at an estimated CAGR of 5.7 percent from 2014 to 2020.&rdquo;
Other key findings of the study suggest:
&bull; The global market for specialty fuel additives was 1,383.4 kilotons in 2013 and is expected to reach 2,066.4 kilotons by 2020, growing at a CAGR of 46 percent from 2014 to 2020.
&bull; Gasoline dominated the global application market for specialty fuel additives, accounting for 46.2 percent of total market volume in 2013. High gasoline demand, mainly in the U.S., is expected to drive the demand for specialty fuel additives used in gasoline. Owing to surging demand for ultra-low sulfur diesel (ULSD), however, diesel is expected to surpass gasoline to emerge as the leading application market for specialty fuel additives by 2020. On the aforementioned factors, diesel is also expected to be the fastest growing application market for specialty fuel additives at an estimated CAGR of 6.5 percent from 2014 to 2020.
&bull; North America dominated the global market for specialty fuel additives and accounted for 27.8 percent of total market volume in 2013. The clean fuel program initiated by the U.S. EPA is expected to drive the regional demand for specialty fuel additives. Rapid strides in fuel consumption by countries such as India and China are expected to turn to Asia Pacific as the most attractive market, however, which is projected to grow at an estimated CAGR of 7 percent from 2014 to 2020. In addition, Asia Pacific is expected to surpass North America to become the largest market for specialty fuel additives by 2020.
&bull; Global market for specialty fuel additives is moderately concentrated with top four companies including NewMarket, Innospec, BASF and Infineum accounting for 48.5 percent of total market in 2013. Other companies operating in the global specialty fuel additives market include Lubrizol, Baker Hughes, Chevron Oronite, Albemarle, Chemtura, Clariant, Dow Chemical Co., Evonik Industries, Eurenco, Total Additives &amp; Special Fuels, Dorf Ketal and NALCO Champion among others.

2014/05/FE-Biodiesel-Bar-0514-01_14000866506823_largethumb.jpg

2014/05/FE-Biodiesel-Bar-0514-01_14000866506823_thumb.jpg

2014/05/FE-Biodiesel-Bar-0514-01_14000866506823.jpg

Cold flow improvers to grow significantly in next 6 years 

America&rsquo;s oldest biodiesel production plant has vacated the Central Maui Landfill. While continuing operations in the collection of used cooking oil and trap grease waste, Pacific Biodiesel has closed its prototype facility. Built in 1996, Pacific Biodiesel&rsquo;s Maui plant has been widely recognized as a pioneer in America&rsquo;s biodiesel industry and was the longest, continually operating commercial biodiesel processing facility in the nation. The Maui operation has won awards from the Solid Waste Association of North America, the National Recycling Coalition and the United Nations Industrial Development Organization.
In December, Pacific Biodiesel was notified by the Maui County Department of Environmental Management that continuing the current operation would require multiple permits and extensive upgrades to comply with new county requirements. Robert King, president and founder of the company, says, &ldquo;With just over two years left on our contract, we couldn&rsquo;t justify the costly site improvements that were required to meet the county&rsquo;s demands.&rdquo;
Pacific Biodiesel will continue its full range of pumping and collection services on Maui and Lanai as well as all its collection and processing operations on Oahu and Hawaii Island. Distribution of the company&rsquo;s biodiesel fuel will continue statewide.
Prior to closing, the Puunene facility was providing preprocessing of waste oils for shipping to its state-of-the-art biodiesel refinery in Hilo. Now that the landfill facility has closed, the cooking oil collected on Maui will be transferred directly to Big Island Biodiesel. Grease trap waste will continue to be processed on Oahu and Hawaii Island.
&ldquo;Needless to say, it was difficult to shut down the plant after all these years but we found ourselves with little recourse given the extent of the requirements to continue operations,&rdquo; says King. &ldquo;We are committed to our community-based model and hope to return to Maui with our industry-leading technology in the future.&rdquo;
In the meantime, Pacific Biodiesel will continue to collect Maui County&rsquo;s waste oils and grease and distribute premium distilled biodiesel across the state. To date, the Maui-based company has diverted more than 22 million gallons of waste from the community&rsquo;s landfill, greatly reduced the frequency of wastewater spills due to clogging by grease, and saved the county&rsquo;s restaurants a lot of money.
Retired Pacific Biodiesel Operations Manager Larry Zolezzi estimates the savings to Maui restaurants to be about $1 million, explaining, &ldquo;The pumpers used to charge $1 per gallon to pick up and dispose of used cooking oil (UCO) and $2 per gallon for grease. As the first biodiesel company in the U.S., we changed the culture about what to do with UCO and now grease.&rdquo; Since 2010, Pacific Biodiesel Logistics has been collecting UCO for free and offering restaurants reduced rates for grease trap service.

BIODIESEL PIONEER: Pacific Biodiesel Technologies' President Bob King, center, said with just over two years left on its contract at the current site, the company couldn't justify the costly improvements to meet the county's demands. 

2014/05/FE-Biodiesel-pacbio-0514_14000870150177_largethumb.jpg

2014/05/FE-Biodiesel-pacbio-0514_14000870150177_thumb.jpg

2014/05/FE-Biodiesel-pacbio-0514_14000870150177.jpg

Pacific Biodiesel closes 18-year-old Maui plant

People are often bemused&mdash;and perhaps even a bit intimidated&mdash;by the world of government. Especially the federal government. The buildings are palatial. Fourteen-karat gold lines the doors and hallways. People speak in coded 18th century language. And, of course, everyone exudes an air of importance.
As a result, I am occasionally asked, &ldquo;What is the secret to being a good lobbyist?&rdquo; It is a good and interesting question. The short answer is to simply &ldquo;be honest and be yourself.&rdquo; While I&rsquo;d love to make it more complicated than that (for purposes of job security), the reality is that adherence to these five little words will get you most of the way there.
Before I delve into a longer and perhaps more satisfying answer, I would like to make an essential point, which is that the vast majority of &ldquo;lobbying&rdquo; is merely education by another name. We help influencers understand technical information related to biodiesel, its feedstocks, and whatever else might keep them from making informed decisions. The thrilling, vicious, high-stakes world of lobbying pretty much only exists on television. Disappointing, I know.
Real success in the field of government affairs relies on good, old-fashioned relationship-building. And just to be clear, I am not advocating for more toothy-grinned, alpha-networking. Everybody hates that. Or at least I do. No, what I am talking about is developing genuine working relationships based on trust and mutual respect. And maybe even friendships, if you&rsquo;re lucky. Once someone knows you, likes you, and trusts you, they&rsquo;ll lend you their time and an open mind. And this, my friends, is fertile ground for biodiesel education. Or lobbying. Whatever you want to call it.
Of course, I&rsquo;m not exactly unlocking any secrets to the universe here. I realize that. So I am not sure this technically qualifies as an answer to the original question. But I guess the secret to being a good lobbyist is that there is no secret. Be around a lot (a whole lot), know your stuff (more than anyone else), be persistent (but polite), and try to be a good person (admitting when you&rsquo;re not). That is kind of it, really. Or, at least, 90 percent of it.
If this answer still leaves you wanting, I don&rsquo;t blame you. This is not exactly the stuff of great novellas and screen plays. But it is the truth. As evidence, I would point you in the direction of our own Joe Jobe and the D.C. team. They have done a phenomenal job developing relationships with federal officials. Next time you attend a National Biodiesel Board meeting, watch them interact with agency and congressional staff. It is obvious they get along great. No tension. No formality. No conflict. Just a lot of positive energy. This is a big part of why such a long string of policy successes have been achieved at the federal level&mdash;from EPAct to the tax credit to RFS2.
In my area of state affairs, I would point to historical successes in states such as Minnesota, Iowa, and California. These are some of the best biodiesel markets in the country with some of the best policies for in-state companies. How were these successes achieved? You guessed it&mdash;good, old-fashioned relationship-building. Of course, these aren&rsquo;t the only states that do a great job, but I think these folks are among the leaders.
In these states, members not only know the decision makers, they are often viewed as friends, advisors and architects of mutually beneficial solutions. In addition to earmarking their own time for these activities, which is critical, they fund state trade associations to further facilitate collaboration, information gathering, and relationship maintenance. In short, they are highly dedicated to being a consistent and helpful part of the legislative and regulatory process. And their wins are a win for the entire biodiesel industry.
So I guess I have a new short answer to &ldquo;What is the secret to being a good lobbyist?&rdquo;&nbsp; Ask Joe or an NBB member from Iowa, Minnesota or California.
Shelby Neal, Director of State Governmental Affairs, National Biodiesel Board

Shelby Neal, director of state governmental affairs, the National Biodiesel Board

2014/05/NBB-Biodiesel-Neal-0514_14000944180914_largethumb.jpg

2014/05/NBB-Biodiesel-Neal-0514_14000944180914_thumb.jpg

2014/05/NBB-Biodiesel-Neal-0514_14000944180914.jpg

I am occasionally asked, "What is the secret to being a good lobbyist?" It is a good and interesting question. The short answer is to simply "be honest and be yourself." Adherence to these five little words will get you most of the way there. 

The Secret to Effective Lobbying

With less than two months until U.S. EPA is expected to release final renewable volume obligations (RVO) under the renewable fuel standard (RFS), it is extremely important that all biodiesel stakeholders continue aggressively advocating for a higher biomass-based diesel standard.
The administration has proposed a standard of just 1.28 billion gallons&mdash;a sharp reduction from 2013 biodiesel production of nearly 1.8 billion gallons. Such a cut would shock the industry and threaten the survival of many biodiesel companies.
The National Biodiesel Board continues to advocate for a higher volume consistent with 2013 production levels, or at least 1.7 billion gallons. NBB has held numerous meetings with EPA and administration officials, ensuring they have access to up-to-date industry data and research. Although these meetings have been productive throughout the rulemaking process, we have seen no firm evidence thus far that the administration intends to increase the biodiesel volume in its final decision.
EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy has said the agency plans to finalize the rule in June. It is important to act quickly to share the individual, personal stories that this proposal will have with a reduced biodiesel volume. While the administration has seen the economic analysis and data from NBB, it is important that they hear from individuals the very real, negative impacts it will have on your companies. Individuals can share their story by writing a letter to the editor or op-ed to the local newspaper, or by seeking media coverage from local media outlets. The economy and jobs in local communities are very important and anything that negatively impacts those will be newsworthy to local media. Be sure to tell your individual story, why the biodiesel industry is important, and how this rule will negatively impact your business and your community.
Biodiesel supporters should also reach out to their members of Congress to remind them how important the RFS is and how much it affects your businesses.
NBB urges you to get engaged. The future growth of the industry depends on it.

2014/05/gavel2_14006024310828_largethumb.JPG

2014/05/gavel2_14006024310828_thumb.JPG

2014/05/gavel2_14006024310828.JPG

The NBB has held numerous meetings with EPA and the administration, ensuring they have access to up-to-date biodiesel industry data and research, but there's no firm evidence yet that suggests they intend to increase biodiesel volumes under RFS. 

Continued RFS advocacy needed as decision nears 

As the petroleum industry continues to sue the U.S. EPA over the renewable fuel standard (RFS), the National Biodiesel Board is actively engaged in helping to defend the law in court. In the latest case, attorneys for NBB delivered oral arguments on April 7 alongside the EPA and Department of Justice in support of the 2013 RFS volumes, particularly the advanced biofuel standard.
The case, brought by oil refiner Monroe Energy LLC and pending before the U.S. Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit, has significant implications for the future of advanced biofuels because we believe it will affirm the EPA&rsquo;s obligation to maintain the required statutory volumes amid persistent, unsupported calls to reduce those volumes.
Monroe Energy, joined by the American Petroleum Institute and other groups, challenged the EPA&rsquo;s handling of the 2013 volume requirements. While a number of renewable fuels groups have joined the case, NBB was the only renewable fuels group to present oral argument alongside the EPA. NBB was represented in court by Bingham McCutchen, the law firm that has successfully handled RFS litigation for NBB since the law&rsquo;s implementation.
Among the arguments supporting the EPA&rsquo;s position, NBB pointed out that the petroleum industry&rsquo;s challenge makes no argument that insufficient volumes of renewable fuels were available in 2013 and fundamentally misinterprets the EPA&rsquo;s authority to waive volume requirements under the law. NBB maintains that the EPA&rsquo;s 2013 standards achieved the directives of Congress.
The Monroe case is the fifth case involving the RFS in which NBB has intervened since 2011. All of the cases have been resolved favorably in EPA&rsquo;s favor, except a case decided in 2013 involving cellulosic ethanol standards. NBB will continue to support biodiesel producers by defending the RFS on all fronts.

2014/05/F2-Biodiesel-DC-0514_14000945999497_largethumb.jpg

2014/05/F2-Biodiesel-DC-0514_14000945999497_thumb.jpg

2014/05/F2-Biodiesel-DC-0514_14000945999497.jpg

In the latest case, attorneys for the National Biodiesel Board delivered oral arguments on April 7 alongside the U.S. EPA and Department of Justice in support of the 2013 renewable fuel standard (RFS) volumes, particularly for advanced biofuels.

NBB again defends RFS in federal court

When U.S. biodiesel production began to take off back in 2005, the fledgling industry quickly became familiar with fuel quality issues and concerns. The BQ-9000 quality assurance programs have since been a major contributor to the now phenomenal fuel quality we have come to expect from commercial suppliers.
&ldquo;Implementing BQ-9000 and getting accredited is a lot of work, but we find following BQ-9000 structure and rules really helps manage and run Thumb BioEnergy,&rdquo; said Leon Jackson of Thumb BioEnergy, a small biodiesel producer in Sandusky, Mich. &ldquo;It has really helped us maximize production and optimize the quality of our fuel. I would highly recommend becoming a BQ-9000-certified producer.&rdquo;
The BQ-9000 quality assurance programs are designed to help ensure that the biodiesel fuel produced, blended, and distributed throughout the U.S. meets and is maintained against the appropriate ASTM specifications. There are currently three voluntary programs developed for producers, fuel marketers and independent laboratories. While these are not product quality certification programs, they ensure the individual companies follow the necessary policies and procedures to maintain the fuel throughout the process by a checklist of independently audited procedures.
The efforts to expand the programs have been largely successful with more than 87 percent of biodiesel produced in 2013 originating from a BQ-9000-certified producer. As the program continues to evolve and improve, there is interest from OEMs and the industry in an expansion of the program to the retail level to further enhance consumer confidence in biodiesel.
For more information on the programs, visit <a href="http://www.bq-9000.org">www.bq-9000.org</a>.

2014/05/NBB-Biodiesel-Testing-0514_14000946650469_largethumb.jpg

2014/05/NBB-Biodiesel-Testing-0514_14000946650469_thumb.jpg

2014/05/NBB-Biodiesel-Testing-0514_14000946650469.jpg

2014/05/NBB-Biodiesel-BQ-9000-0514_14000946606551.jpg

When U.S. biodiesel production began to take off in 2005, the industry quickly became familiar with fuel quality issues. The BQ-9000 programs have since been a major contributor to the now-phenomenal fuel quality we expect from commercial suppliers. 

Voluntary BQ-9000 programs pay off for participants, industry

ASTM International is the standards development organization that sets specifications for thousands of consumer products, including fuels like biodiesel. Unlike many other global standards development organizations, ASTM&rsquo;s decentralized committee system, open forum, and administrative framework allow for anyone interested in a particular area to participate. For biodiesel producers, this means you can be directly involved in setting the standards that govern your industry.
ASTM standards are developed related to the minimum product quality limits, as well as the methodologies used to analyze those products. With committees covering everything from air quality to concrete and plastics, the biodiesel industry participates in Committee D02 for &ldquo;Petroleum Products, Liquid Fuels and Lubricants.&rdquo;
Committee D02 is ASTM&rsquo;s largest committee with more than 2,400 members from 65-plus countries, from public- and private-sector interests. Members include petroleum companies; biodiesel producers; auto, truck and engine manufacturers; the military; and general interest companies such as government organizations and laboratory instrument manufacturers. Each individual member has options of participating in subcommittees dealing with products such as gasoline, diesel fuels, jet fuel, LPG, lubricants and hydraulic fluids; or in subcommittees dealing with specific properties such as combustion, elemental analysis, flow properties, and stability and cleanliness.
Being a member of ASTM allows access and input into the ballot items as well as access to the semiannual member meetings for further discussion with industry peers. Becoming involved in the standardization process is the best way to become aware of, and provide input to, potential new limits and test methods for your products. While ASTM plays no role in enforcing any of the limits set forth, the standards become mandatory when cited in regulations or in business contracts. These regulations can have a major impact on the fuel produced at biodiesel facilities across the country.
To join and participate, anyone can enroll at <a href="http://www.astm.org/MEMBERSHIP/index.html">http://www.astm.org/MEMBERSHIP/index.html</a> or contact NBB.

2014/05/F2-Biodiesel-ASTM-0514_1400094728783_largethumb.jpg

2014/05/F2-Biodiesel-ASTM-0514_1400094728783_thumb.jpg

2014/05/F2-Biodiesel-ASTM-0514_1400094728783.jpg

Unlike many other global standards development organizations, ASTM's decentralized committee system, open forum, and administrative framework allow for anyone interested in a particular area to participate. 

Participate in ASTM: You can have a role in biodiesel standards

No one ever expects an accident to happen to them. That is why they are called accidents. All businesses have risks involved and the production and transport of biodiesel is no exception. If something happened to your company tomorrow, would you be ready? No matter what the issue is, the National Biodiesel Board has resources that can help.
&ldquo;While we hope it&rsquo;s never needed, our members can access experts on staff in communications, public relations, fuel quality and testing, the petroleum supply chain, and all kinds of other areas that can be helpful in an emergency,&rdquo; said NBB Director of Communications Jessica Robinson.
Emergencies can come in lots of different forms, but one of the best ways to deal with an emergency is to have a plan ahead of time.
&ldquo;A fire, tornado, train derailments, operations issues in a customer&rsquo;s vehicle, these are all things that can be a problem, and they don&rsquo;t always happen between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. on weekdays,&rdquo; Robinson said. &ldquo;If having your trade association on speed dial isn&rsquo;t part of your emergency plan, it should be. We are here to help.&rdquo;
With advancements in technology, it is easier than ever to get a hold of your association staff if an emergency situation should occur. Smart phones allow 24/7 access to email. Phone messages left on the office voicemail system are automatically forwarded to the individual&rsquo;s email, so leaving a message at 800-841-5849 is an option.
&ldquo;If you are writing up a crisis communication plan for your plant and want to include our cell phone numbers, just call the office or email us and we would be happy to get you that too,&rdquo; said Robinson. &ldquo;We may not answer on the first ring at 2 a.m., but if you leave a message you will definitely hear back from us in short order.&rdquo;

All businesses have risks involved and the production and transport of biodiesel is no exception. If something happened to your company tomorrow, would you be ready? No matter what the issue is, the National Biodiesel Board has resources to help. 

No. 1 resource: Your trade association on speed dial

The National Biodiesel Foundation recently awarded a grant to the National Biodiesel Board to improve the science of greenhouse gas (GHG) modeling. Greenhouse gas reductions add to the economic and energy security benefits of biodiesel as an alternative to imported petroleum. Renewability and environmental benefits are something that fossil fuels simply can&rsquo;t offer, so quantifying these benefits sets biodiesel apart from other alternatives in state and federal energy policies.
&ldquo;The greatest potential for improving the accuracy of biodiesel&rsquo;s GHG score is to improve the quantification of indirect land use change associated with feedstock production,&rdquo; said Don Scott, director of sustainability at NBB. Under the NBF grant, NBB expects to improve the accuracy of data used in economic and life-cycle models. The biodiesel industry has set responsible goals based on the availability of feedstocks without increasing prices or acres.
Scott further explains, &ldquo;The current theory of indirect land use change relies on the assumption that feedstock prices will increase, so the models are predicting outcomes nearly the opposite of what is actually happening.&rdquo; In 2013, record biodiesel production demonstrated that feedstocks could remain in abundant supply. Biodiesel production increased 35 percent while soybean oil prices dropped 25 percent. &ldquo;If the scientific community continues to improve the modeling, it is likely that model results will converge with reality and show zero indirect land use change emissions attributable to U.S. biodiesel,&rdquo; Scott said.
NBF hopes to continue to support biodiesel research through projects such as the NBB grant to improve data inputs to GHG models. &ldquo;NBF has shown a superior ability to manage the complex, technical projects required so that the science surrounding indirect land use change can be improved,&rdquo; said NBF Vice President Beth Calabotta.
NBF encourages others to get involved as there is considerably more research to do. For more information about the foundation and its activities, or to show your support of its projects, visit <a href="http://www.BiodieselFoundation.org">www.BiodieselFoundation.org</a>.

2014/05/NBB-Biodiesel-Chart-0514_14000948454729_largethumb.jpg

2014/05/NBB-Biodiesel-Chart-0514_14000948454729_thumb.jpg

2014/05/NBB-Biodiesel-Chart-0514_14000948454729.jpg

2014/05/NBB-Biodiesel-NBF-0514_14000948475947.jpg

The National Biodiesel Foundation recently awarded a grant to the National Biodiesel Board to improve the science of greenhouse gas (GHG) modeling. GHG reductions add to the economic and energy security benefits of biodiesel as an alternative fuel. 

Biodiesel Foundation: Investing in good science helps the industry

Alfa Laval launched a new range of tantalum heat exchangers that offer the high corrosion resistance of a solid-tantalum heat exchanger, but at a much lower investment cost. The combined benefits of lower capital cost, long-lifetime and minimal maintenance requirements result in significantly lower total cost of ownership compared to heat exchangers made of high-grade alloys, graphite, silicon carbide or glass. Tantalum is one of the most corrosion-resistant metals, but it&rsquo;s also very costly. Alfa Laval&rsquo;s new tantalum heat exchangers have a thin layer of tantalum metallurgically bonded to all surfaces exposed to corrosive media. The result is maximum corrosion resistance and mechanical stability at a low investment cost. The tantalum surface allows Alfa Laval&rsquo;s new heat exchangers to be used with most corrosive media at temperatures up to 437 degrees Fahrenheit. Unlike many high-grade alloys, they can be used with mixed media and at variable concentrations.
Methes Energies International Ltd. announced it has received a deposit from Antilla Energy VBA, formally known as BioFuel Aruba, to start the manufacturing process of one Denami 600 to be delivered to Aruba. The Denami 600 is expected to be delivered in September. Antilla will utilize locally collected waste cooking oil to produce biodiesel that will then be blended with diesel fuel and distributed to clients across the island. Antilla Energy VBA is a national company focused on the development and implementation of island-based biodiesel projects utilizing nonfood crop biodiesel feedstocks such as used cooking oil and algae.
Targray, a leader in North American biodiesel supply, announced a new inventory location for biodiesel in Bakersfield, Calf. Service for B99 and B100 began in mid-February. Targray will supply biodiesel to its growing customer base in California using the terminal's 24/7 truck rack. &ldquo;Targray has been a major supplier of biodiesel by railcar to the California market,&rdquo; says Andrew Richardson, president of Targray. &ldquo;We are pleased to take it a step further by providing our customers with this strategic California inventory location able to serve both the north and the south.&rdquo; Dan Murray, Targray vice president, says, &ldquo;We have several active customers in California. We are now reaching out to them to make them aware that they can pick up full truckloads or even splash blend with us now in Bakersfield.&rdquo;
Great Lakes Biodiesel Inc., the largest biodiesel-producing plant in Canada, received BQ-9000 Producer status from the National Biodiesel Accreditation Commission. This designation is the highest level of industry recognized quality assurance. BQ-9000 is a cooperative and voluntary quality assurance program administered by the National Biodiesel Board for the accreditation of producers and marketers of biodiesel fuel. The program addresses requirements of the ASTM standard for biodiesel, D6751, within a structured quality system that controls storage, sampling, testing, blending, shipping, distribution, and fuel management practices. Certification is awarded following a successful formal review and audit of the applicant&rsquo;s quality system documentation, followed by a formal audit of the applicant&rsquo;s conformance to its system. Great Lakes Biodiesel is located in Welland, Ontario. GLB is a member of the National Biodiesel Board and Ontario Biodiesel Producers Association. The GLB facility is the largest biodiesel plant in Canada producing 45 MMgy made from vegetable oils. The plant uses state-of-the-art Desmet Ballestra production equipment, which is in service in more than 80 biodiesel plants around the world.
The Iowa Biodiesel Board has chosen Grant Kimberley, Iowa Soybean Association director of market development, as its new executive director to fill the vacancy left by Randy Olson, who took a position with the U.S. Soybean Export Council earlier this year. As executive director, Kimberley&rsquo;s first official day on the job was March 18, National Biodiesel Day. In his new role, Kimberley will develop and implement strategic plans for the IBB, including critical policy efforts. His duties will include overseeing the day-to-day operation of the organization, and collaborating with the board for the future of the organization. Kimberley joined the ISA staff in 2000. He graduated with a bachelor&rsquo;s degree in agriculture business from Northwest Missouri State University, and also has a master&rsquo;s degree in public administration from Drake University. Prior to joining ISA in 2000, he worked for Monsanto. He began farming in 1995 and became the sixth generation of his family to farm in the U.S.
In April, the mayor of New Zealand&rsquo;s capital city of Wellington, Celia Wade-Brown, welcomed an announcement by Z Energy of the company&rsquo;s plans to invest $21 million in a 20 MMly (5.3 MMgy) biodiesel production facility. Z Energy, headquartered in Wellington, says it plans to use tallow as feedstock for its new plant, using about 10 percent of the country&rsquo;s inedible tallow production. Wade-Brown says the announcement heralds a reduction in New Zealand&rsquo;s reliance on fossil fuels and will help the country address climate change concerns. &ldquo;Cities, countries and [corporations] all have a role to play in ensuring the world addresses very real climate change concerns,&rdquo; she says. &ldquo;It&rsquo;s great to see local company Z Energy leading new energy sources and developing a green economy for New Zealand.&rdquo;

2014/05/BB-Biodiesel-BQ-9000-0514_14000949586422.jpg

2014/05/BB-Biodiesel-Kimberley-0514_14000949633799.jpg

2014/05/BB-Biodiesel-Tantalum-0514_14000949668356.jpg

Business Briefs

Since its commercial inception in the 1990s, the biodiesel industry has faced obstacles from all sides. The technical merits of the fuel have been challenged time and time again. Manufacturing costs and fuel pricing have been used to discredit biodiesel. Free marketeers have tarnished its reputation because government mandates and subsidies attempt to level the playing field with the petroleum industry, which still today after more than a century of domination, receives billions of dollars of government handouts a year. And the oil lobbies have waged smear campaigns on all fronts. Even the federal government&mdash;and certainly the current administration that has used biodiesel for its own political gains&mdash;has seemingly caved to the pressures of Big Oil and Big Food. This became evident last fall when the U.S. EPA suggested stalling the biomass-based diesel quota and shrinking the advanced biofuel mandate in its 2014-&rsquo;15 renewable volume obligation (RVO) proposal for the renewable fuel standard (RFS). But perhaps the most referenced hindrance to biodiesel growth is global availability of fats, oils and greases (FOG).
&ldquo;The constraints to biodiesel growth aren&rsquo;t really from the feedstock side,&rdquo; says John Kruse, one of the owners and directors of quantitative analysis at World Agricultural Economic and Environmental Services LLC, a firm contracted by the National Biodiesel Board to analyze feedstock markets and different scenarios to better understand how the market reacts with different policies. WAEES also does exploratory work with NBB to look at what the potential for the market is, depending on what EPA does with RFS volumes year-over-year. &ldquo;Flipping it around a little, the constraints are where the market has to pay a high price for distribution and infrastructure to move biodiesel into the marketplace,&rdquo; he says.
Kruse says now is a critical time for the biodiesel industry because EPA&rsquo;s proposal establishes a potentially dangerous precedent for how the agency may set future mandates under RFS. &ldquo;The longer-term aspect of how they propose to set the mandate based on demand, where you have the crude oil or petroleum industry as strong influencers in how much demand there is by defining the infrastructure available,&rdquo; Kruse tells Biodiesel Magazine. &ldquo;That&rsquo;s perhaps a much more damaging aspect of their foreshadowing of how they want to set policy in the future. How do you ever get growth when you have the petroleum industry, which views you as a competitor, regulating your demand?&rdquo;&nbsp; Clearly, according to Kruse, the EPA&rsquo;s proposal to stall the biomass-based diesel standard at 1.28 billion gallons for 2014-&rsquo;15 is not because of feedstock shortages or potential disruptions in the commodities markets from biodiesel growth.
Gene Gebolys, the founder, president and CEO of World Energy Alternatives, has chaired the RFS working group for NBB for the past five years. &ldquo;One thing that is becoming increasingly clear to the working group is that RFS matters to biodiesel across all RIN categories&mdash;D6, D5, D4, D3,&rdquo; Gebolys tells Biodiesel Magazine. &ldquo;They all matter to biodiesel. A lot of people think only what&rsquo;s important is D4, biomass-based diesel, but what clearly happened in 2013 is that biodiesel was really a D5, an advanced biofuel technology, more so than a biomass-based diesel technology.&rdquo; Therefore, what the EPA sets for its final rule in the advanced biofuel category (D5) is at least as important as what level it sets the D4 category. On the agency&rsquo;s proposal to cut back D5 and hold D4 to 2013 levels, Gebolys says, &ldquo;We think the legislation is pretty clear that the EPA has to come out with a 3.75-billion-gallon requirement in the D5 category&mdash;as a matter of statute. We don&rsquo;t believe they have the authority to do something other than 3.75 billion for advanced.&rdquo; The NBB RFS working group&rsquo;s position is clear, he adds. &ldquo;You have to do what the statute says you have to do, and for D4, you do have flexibility to set at whatever level you chose to, but it&rsquo;s clear that the statute set a trajectory up. You at least have to do 1 billion gallons, but it also says it can increase year on year. We think that the minimum that EPA ought to consider setting the standard for D4 is 1.7 billion. The industry produced 1.8 billion gallons last year, so even setting it at 1.7 would be a decline from what the industry has already proven it can do.&rdquo;
More importantly, however, the higher the D5 category is set, the higher the D4 category must be for EPA to address its own objectives. &ldquo;EPA has made a big deal about its desire to reduce blend wall impacts,&rdquo; Gebolys says. &ldquo;And since there are two ways to satisfy the D5 category, [Brazilian ethanol and biomass-based diesel] it&rsquo;s important to understand that the higher they set the D4 category, the more that D5 category will be met by diesel-based technology rather than gasoline-based technology.&rdquo;The more that it&rsquo;s met by diesel-based technology, the less impact the D5 category will have on the blend wall concern. &ldquo;So for EPA&rsquo;s own purposes of reducing the pressure on the blend wall, it&rsquo;s important that they increase the component of the mandate that is biomass-based diesel,&rdquo; he adds.
Global Perspective
WAEES uses a large, global partial equilibrium model with more than 20,000 equations that looks at everything from biofuels to individual commodity markets, forming the basis for how it looks at biofuel and feedstock markets. &ldquo;There&rsquo;s often this perception that there&rsquo;s this huge shortage of feedstock, and that&rsquo;s just simply not the case,&rdquo; Kruse says. &ldquo;The thing is, we find ourselves potentially in a glut of feedstock, and those feedstocks are coming from sources that we didn&rsquo;t traditionally necessarily think about.&rdquo; Distillers corn oil (DCO) from ethanol plants and used cooking oil (UCO) from the food service industries are two of those sources.
Kruse says for DCO, his forecast looks out to 2030 when 90 to 95 percent of U.S. ethanol plants are de-oiling distillers grains. &ldquo;When we get to 2022, we get about 70 percent [of DCO] going to biodiesel and 30 percent going to animal feed,&rdquo; Kruse says, &ldquo;but we peak at around 520 MMgy of biodiesel from distillers corn oil.&rdquo; He says you can draw more into biodiesel depending on what the mandates are. &ldquo;It&rsquo;s closely tied to that,&rdquo; Kruse explains. &ldquo;It&rsquo;s a big jump, about four to five times where we&rsquo;re at right now.&rdquo; For UCO, he says data is thin on how much there really is out in the market. &ldquo;There are estimates that say there might be 50 to 70 percent more, maybe 100 percent more, yellow grease than what&rsquo;s currently being reported,&rdquo; he says. &ldquo;That&rsquo;s just in the U.S. Globally, that data is quite a bit harder to put your fingers on.&rdquo;
Biodiesel is a small, minority subset of the overall demand for FOG, and the U.S. is only a subset of global biodiesel demand. So to make sense of any of the feedstock issues, global supply and that which affects supply must be taken into account: weather patterns and currency devaluation in Argentina; political strife in Ukraine; swine disease in the U.S.; the wildcard of China&rsquo;s purchasing habits; and thousands of other issues around the world.
&ldquo;Did we know we were going to have a drought in Brazil last year?&rdquo; Gebolys asks. &ldquo;No, we didn&rsquo;t. Did we know we&rsquo;d have a drought in the U.S. the previous year? No, we didn&rsquo;t. But we get more and more information as time goes by, and we build it into the model. Do we know what kind of yields we&rsquo;re going to get year over year? No, we don&rsquo;t. But we can continue to get more information and improve the model as time goes forward. That said, what we do know is that the world is generating more and more feedstock year on year. Even in the face of a 70 percent increase in biodiesel production in the U.S. last year, feedstock prices went down&mdash;not up&mdash;meaning we could put a lot more pressure on feedstock markets without causing dramatic disruptions in the market.&rdquo;
Kruse says, &ldquo;I always have trouble with the statement about &lsquo;disrupting&rsquo; current markets, because part of what the ag sector was so excited about with biofuels in general was it&rsquo;s a new demand source.&rdquo; Like any other sector, if you ramp demand up quickly, there will be a price effect. &ldquo;But what biofuels do is provide another source of demand that helps avoid the spiraling down into a situation of ever-declining real prices for ag products,&rdquo; Kruse says. &ldquo;Without growth in demand, that&rsquo;s ultimately where you go.&rdquo; He adds that supply has always outpaced demand growth in the ag sector.
Record US Soybean Planting
The U.S. biodiesel industry was founded on soybean oil, and roughly half of all feedstock used in biodiesel production remains soy oil. Based on USDA&rsquo;s Prospective Plantings report in March, U.S. farmers intend to plant a record 81.5 million acres of soybeans in 2014&mdash;up 5 million from 2013. While record planting bodes well for biodiesel feedstock prices, it&rsquo;s only half of the equation. Favorable growing weather must follow suit to hit record bean production. Also, the U.S. has only so much crush capacity. One source tells Biodiesel Magazine that record U.S. bean production may affect prices, but it doesn&rsquo;t mean a different supply and demand for soybean oil.
In the past 10 years, record soybean production was experienced in the 2009-&rsquo;10 crop season. That was 3.359 billion bushels produced. The lowest production was in the 2007-&rsquo;08 crop year at 2.677 billion bushels. The high and low delta was 682 million bushels. &ldquo;But in that same period, our record crush numbers in 2006-&rsquo;07 were at 1.808 billion bushels,&rdquo; the source says. &ldquo;And our low crush numbers for the past 10 years were in 2010-&rsquo;11 at 1.648 billion bushels crushed,&rdquo; a difference of 160 million bushels. The soybean export numbers are figures that vary much more dramatically than crush. In 2013-&rsquo;14, the current crop year, the USDA is estimating 1.58 billion bushels of soybean exports, and in the 2005-&rsquo;06 crop year, exports were only 940 million bushels. This equates to a 640 million bushel difference in the past 10 years, high to low. &ldquo;If we were to meet our record crush for the 2006-&lsquo;07 crop year versus this year, that means an additional 123 million bushels,&rdquo; the source says.&ldquo;And for bean oil production, what that means is roughly 1.3 billion pounds of oil, or 175 million gallons of biodiesel year on year.&rdquo; In short, record soybean acreage does not mean record soybean production; and record soybean production does not correlate linearly to that much more soy oil on the domestic market due to limited crush capacity. What record U.S. soybean production means in general is higher exports.
Nowhere Near the Limits
There&rsquo;s a growing set of literature out there that correlates commodity yields with respect to commodity prices, Kruse says, so in periods of high prices, the argument is farmers adopt more, and new, technologies. &ldquo;They&rsquo;re faster to try some of those things because it&rsquo;s less risky, and that increases the efficiencies,&rdquo; he says. &ldquo;They get more yields per acre, so it&rsquo;s a win-win for everyone, and all of those technology advancements ultimately benefit consumers the most because it reduces the cost they have to pay for food or whatever the ingredient is. There is a lot of empirical evidence&mdash;we have it in our models&mdash;where there is some impact back on yields when you have higher prices, and vice versa with lower prices. Certainly from the demand side, it&rsquo;s been just a little frustrating for me because there&rsquo;s a lot of misinformation circulating on how additional demand will result in this much new land use being brought into production. We&rsquo;re going to have to cut the rainforest down to do this, and all this kind of stuff, which is simply not accurate.&rdquo;
Gebolys says the best thing we can do to develop next-generation feedstocks like algae, jatropha, camelina, pennycress and other sources, is create greater demand for the existing-generation feedstocks. &ldquo;As long as we can continue to do that, and create expanding demand, I strongly believe that next-generation feedstocks will emerge.&rdquo; But, he says, they certainly won&rsquo;t emerge in an environment in which there&rsquo;s not adequate demand for first-generation feedstocks such as soybean oil. &ldquo;There are folks out there who want to make innovation in feedstock the enemy of our current capabilities, and that&rsquo;s really foolish,&rdquo; Gebolys says. &ldquo;There&rsquo;s a lot of talk about foregoing first-generation biofuels for next-generation biofuels, and the most certain way to kill next-generation biofuels is to take a pause in current-generation biofuels.&rdquo; Conversely, the most certain way to advance next-generation biofuels and the feedstocks from which they will be manufactured is to continue to grow existing-generation biofuels.
On any given day, feedstocks can be tight. But over the course of a year, markets basically adjust. &ldquo;There is plenty of global feedstock for this industry to continue to expand well into the future,&rdquo; Gebolys says. &ldquo;We&rsquo;ve come nowhere close yet to hitting the far end of our capability. When we were first looking at this stuff, there were people in this industry that said there&rsquo;s not enough feedstock for this industry to ever produce more than 500 million gallons. And these are very knowledgeable folks.&rdquo;
In the latter half of 2013, however, the U.S. biodiesel industry was producing at an annualized run rate 2.4 billion gallons. &ldquo;That&rsquo;s effectively five times what those so-called experts originally thought was the high end of what we could do,&rdquo; Gebolys says. &ldquo;I guess the lessons learned are that the so-called experts don&rsquo;t really fully take into account how flexible markets are in addressing expanding industry capabilities. If we demand feedstock, feedstock will be there for us to continue to produce biodiesel at higher and higher rates for a long time. Markets have not indicated to us yet that we are anywhere close to reaching those limits.&rdquo;
 Author: Ron Kotrba Editor, Biodiesel Magazine 218-745-8347 <a href="mailto:rkotrba@bbiinternational.com">rkotrba@bbiinternational.com</a>

2014/05/F1-Biodiesel-Lead-0514_14000951263081_largethumb.jpg

2014/05/F1-Biodiesel-Lead-0514_14000951263081_thumb.jpg

2014/05/F1-Biodiesel-Lead-0514_14000951263081.jpg

2014/05/F1-Biodiesel-Gene-0514_14000951209032.jpg

2014/05/F1-Biodiesel-Kruse-0514_14000951235756.jpg

2014/05/F1-Biodiesel-Slide9-0514_14000951281909.jpg

2014/05/F1-Biodiesel-Slide20-0514_14000951302701.jpg

Greater demand for agricultural commodities from all sectors will expand current—and push development of new—supplies of fats, oils and greases for biodiesel growth

The Myth & Reality of Biodiesel Feedstock Availability 

The synergies between co-located ethanol and biodiesel production have been discussed for a decade. The existing infrastructure to share process essentials, an in-house feedstock in distillers corn oil (DCO), and use of ethanol rather than methanol for biodiesel reactions are the more obvious benefits. Biodiesel technology providers want contracts in this highly sought-after market. For ethanol producers, the attraction is added value through biodiesel rather than crude corn oil sales, and D4 RIN generation. But it&rsquo;s also about diversification and fulfilling the renewable fuel standard&rsquo;s (RFS) vision.
&ldquo;Over the past several years, biodiesel margins have been really strong,&rdquo; says Ray Baker, general manager for Adkins Energy LLC, a 50 MMgy ethanol refinery in Lena, Ill. Adkins Energy announced last fall that it has contracted with WB Services to install a 2 MMgy biodiesel facility on-site with help from a $500,000 grant from USDA&rsquo;s Rural Energy for America Program. &ldquo;But one of the reasons I think we really like the project and the idea behind it,&rdquo; Baker says, &ldquo;is that we are already producing a conventional biofuel&mdash;corn-based ethanol&mdash;and we&rsquo;ll now be producing an advanced biofuel in biodiesel, and I know in the future we&rsquo;ll have the opportunity to be producing cellulosic ethanol. So we look at all aspects of the RFS and the growth that&rsquo;s really built into that, and we see those opportunities.&rdquo;
In recent years, DCO has emerged as one of the fastest-growing biodiesel feedstocks, and the technologies to effectively convert DCO to biodiesel have been improving. &ldquo;I think once they got to that point, that helped the technology evolve and the idea behind it become more economical to install into a plant,&rdquo; he says. &ldquo;Before, the size of biodiesel plants was much larger, and now I think bolting them onto ethanol technologies on a smaller scale has become economical.&rdquo;
Ron Beemiller, president and CEO of WB Services, says, &ldquo;From my perspective, the reason this idea of integrating was never fully realized is, nobody ever had a real clear understanding of both processes enough to do the integration properly.&rdquo; WB Services has more than 10 years&rsquo; experience in the ethanol sector. &ldquo;We&rsquo;ve been working on [the co-location concept] now for two or three years,&rdquo; he says, &ldquo;and it&rsquo;s not only the biodiesel technology itself through our commercialization efforts with Novozymes, but also through the utilization components with how we can best utilize the infrastructure that exists to maximize return for the plant.&rdquo;
WB Services is installing both a traditional acid esterification/base transesterification system at Adkins, as well as an enzymatic process&mdash;newer technology in the biodiesel space pioneered by Piedmont Biofuels several years ago, now running in facilities such as Blue Sun&rsquo;s St. Joseph, Mo., plant and Viesel Fuel in Stuart, Fla. Pearland, Texas-based Biodiesel Experts International also manufactures enzymatic biodiesel skids.
&ldquo;Per batch, it can run either way,&rdquo; Beemiller says. &ldquo;We intend to run enzymatic.&rdquo; DCO traditionally runs between 10 and 15 percent free fatty acids (FFA), but Beemiller says he can offer performance guarantees far above that with the enzymatic technology. Rather than using what would traditionally be Novozymes&rsquo; approach, WB Services &ldquo;kind of took it from a different perspective,&rdquo; Beemiller says. &ldquo;We basically use the enzyme as a pretreatment step to lower the FFA or to convert all the way to biodiesel, and then we do a few other steps as well, whether that&rsquo;s an additional reaction along with additional polishing, and a few other things. It&rsquo;s not the way that the Blue Suns of the world are doing it. We took a slightly different approach.&rdquo;
WB Services has a patent pending on the integration aspects with co-location of biodiesel production at ethanol facilities. &ldquo;We try to minimize the amount of outside components that need to be brought in while we maximize the use of the existing infrastructure,&rdquo; Beemiller says. &ldquo;Whether it&rsquo;s bringing products from the ethanol plant to the biodiesel facility to utilize steam or energy, or whether it&rsquo;s sending coproducts that are made or consumed within the biodiesel process, and sending them back through the ethanol plant. We&rsquo;ve spent a considerable amount of time trying to maximize the use of the infrastructure that exists today.&rdquo;
Baker says the option to distill biodiesel was necessary, and only added 5 to 6 percent of the entire plant cost. &ldquo;For our market here in Illinois, which we&rsquo;re excited to be a part of, there&rsquo;s quite a bit of production, and distillation is the preferred product,&rdquo; he says. &ldquo;We want to be able to put the best product into that market.&rdquo; Illinois is a very biodiesel-friendly state. Any biodiesel blended into on-road diesel fuel above 10 percent is exempt from sales tax, making B11 the blend of choice.&nbsp;
Beemiller explains the advantage of using ethanol for the reaction. &ldquo;The combination of ethanol availability coupled with the ability to blend recovered ethanol back into the plant instead of putting in all the capital equipment to collect and clean it is one of the components that we worked on,&rdquo; he says.
In designing the plant, WB Services worked to use much of the same equipment, such as valves and pumps, as is used in the ethanol plant. The interchangeability is an asset.&nbsp; &ldquo;For instance, Sulzer pumps are used because that&rsquo;s what&rsquo;s in the ethanol plant,&rdquo; Beemiller says. &ldquo;That way they can utilize the spare parts from one to the other.&rdquo; The agitators are ProQuip Inc., just like the ethanol plant. A Flottweg centrifuge will also be utilized. Apache Stainless Equipment Corp. and A&amp;B Process Systems Corp. provided tanks and vessels for the project. &ldquo;Really all of the instrumentation, the DCS, all the major equipment, it was all spec&rsquo;d out to match what exists in the ethanol plant,&rdquo; Beemiller says.&nbsp;
Construction is underway but the harsh winter has delayed anticipated commissioning until second quarter.&nbsp;
Patriot Fuels, Biodiesel LLC
Less than two hours south from Lena is Annawan, Ill., where Jatrodiesel Inc.&rsquo;s first commercial supercritical biodiesel plant, a 5 MMgy facility, is being installed at the 120 MMgy Patriot Renewable Fuels LLC ethanol refinery. &ldquo;Jatrodiesel is a small company, but they have vast experience building smaller biodiesel plants that convert the harder-to-process feedstocks,&rdquo; says Rick Vondra, vice president and general manager of PRF. &ldquo;For the scale and scope of what we wanted to do, it looked like a pretty good fit. Corn oil is not the easiest to convert.&rdquo; Vondra says permits are not yet in hand, but he expects to have them soon. &ldquo;We had an official groundbreaking although we haven&rsquo;t started construction yet,&rdquo; he says. &ldquo;Hopefully we&rsquo;ll get that completed in a few weeks, and start putting some steel in the ground.&rdquo;&nbsp; While the EPA&rsquo;s 2014 RFS proposal to stall biomass-based diesel at 1.28 billion gallons and reduce the ethanol RVO, in addition to the lapse of an important $1-per-gallon biodiesel tax credit, are on everyone&rsquo;s minds in the biofuel sectors, Vondra says he&rsquo;s convinced the project is viable even without a tax credit.
&ldquo;We generally see a lot of business advantages when a biodiesel plant is vertically integrated into an existing feedstock-producing plant,&rdquo; says Raj Mosali, president of Jatrodiesel. In a traditional process, acid esterification is employed to convert FFA to biodiesel, and base transesterification using a catalyst such as sodium methylate converts triglycerides into biodiesel. &ldquo;In the Super process, we eliminated the use of catalyst&mdash;acid or base, or an enzyme&mdash;altogether,&rdquo; Mosali says. &ldquo;In a nutshell, we send a mixture of methanol and oil and out comes the biodiesel and glycerin. The advantages are savings in catalyst costs, simplicity of the process, true multifeedstock capability, up to 100 percent FFA capability and high-quality glycerin.&rdquo;
While the Super process requires more energy than traditional approaches, Mosali says if you do a normalized comparison between traditional and Super, between 12 and 18 percent savings overall are achieved, considering utilities, chemicals, operational expenses and more. &ldquo;And if you consider soft costs such as training the operators, the savings are higher,&rdquo; he says.
The Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity New Generation Biofuels Production Program is providing funding and development assistance for the ethanol plant&rsquo;s new subsidiary, Patriot Fuels, Biodiesel LLC. The estimated cost, according to Vondra, is more than $10 million.
CPT&rsquo;s MarketFlex
Another option available to ethanol producers is Cereal Process Technologies LLC&rsquo;s MarketFlex, a capital-intense system of dry fractionation that separates the corn upfront to get higher quality oil, and much more of it, along with a traditional biodiesel process. &ldquo;I think it&rsquo;s strictly a matter of how much money they want to make,&rdquo; says Pete Moss, president of CPT, on why ethanol producers might choose this route. &ldquo;A lot of the emphasis in the past has been on the value of ethanol, but now the focus is edging more toward oil.&rdquo;
Moss says while many backend extraction technologies yield half a pound of oil per bushel (OPB), dry fracking could yield up to 1.4 pounds OPB on the frontend, plus an additional quarter pound on the back. More oil could simply equate to more profit and better economies of scale, allowing a larger biodiesel production facility on-site. He says the spread between higher value edible corn oil and DCO has narrowed significantly. DCO is approximately 33 cents per pound with up to 15 percent FFA while crude corn oil with less than 4 percent FFA sells for about 42 cents. Moss says he is working to develop a pathway with the U.S. EPA so biodiesel produced from oil from dry fracking can generate valuable D4 RINs. &ldquo;You had what used to be a much lower value inedible oil that can generate a more valuable RIN, versus a higher value edible oil that would not generate a RIN,&rdquo; Moss says. &ldquo;Now the spreads have narrowed so the differential between those two feedstocks is quite a bit closer than what it used to be. And a key factor is getting the new pathway to be able to generate the D4 RIN.&rdquo;
For a 100 MMgy ethanol plant processing 36 million bushels a year, the estimated capital costs, according to Moss, are $28 million for fractionation, $10 million for solvent extraction, and $15 million for a 10 MMgy biodiesel facility, totaling $53 million. A same-sized plant just selling DCO would generate $37 million in earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA), whereas a plant with fractionation plus solvent extraction and biodiesel production EBITDA would be $65 million, according to Moss, meaning an annual improvement $28 million.&nbsp;
&nbsp; Author: Ron Kotrba Editor, Biodiesel Magazine 218-745-8347 <a href="mailto:rkotrba@bbiinternational.com">rkotrba@bbiinternational.com</a>

BIODIESEL TRANSPORT: It wonâ€™t be long before the 120 MMgy Patriot Renewable Fuelsâ€™ ethanol plant will be shipping millions of gallons of biodiesel from its multirenewable fuel facility in Annawan, Ill. 

2014/05/F2-Biodiesel-Patriot-0514_14000953123622_largethumb.jpg

2014/05/F2-Biodiesel-Patriot-0514_14000953123622_thumb.jpg

2014/05/F2-Biodiesel-Patriot-0514_14000953123622.jpg

2014/05/F2-Ethanol-Diagram-0514-01_14000953150368.jpg

2014/05/F2-Ethanol-Flow-0514-01_14000953188189.jpg

After years of talk, co-location of biodiesel production at ethanol plants is finally being realized. 

Time Has Come Today

The question of what oil pretreatment method is the best is an ongoing conversation among biodiesel producers and engineers. Most low-grade feed oils contain high levels of free fatty acids (FFA), which can cause soap formation in traditional biodiesel processes. Several different pretreatment methods are used commercially to assimilate or remove FFA: acid esterification, vacuum steam stripping, caustic washing and glycerolysis; we consider enzymatics to be at the precommercial stage. The most prevalent pretreatment method has traditionally been acid esterification, since it can be done at relatively low process temperatures. The goal of acid esterification is the direct conversion of FFA into methyl esters (biodiesel) using sulfuric acid as a catalyst, with an excess of methanol. During acid esterification, each mole of fatty acid converted to methyl esters produces one mole of water. The resulting wet methanol must then be decanted, neutralized and dried via fractional distillation with high reflux rates, before it can be reused. Methanol drying columns can cost millions of dollars and are the biggest users of plant energy. By not having to dry wet methanol after acid esterification, biodiesel plants can cut their thermal energy consumption in half.
Alternatively, glycerolysis reduces the amount of FFA in low-grade oils without use of acid or methanol, and enables them to be converted into final product, rather than removing them and reducing product yield. The resulting glycerides formed during glycerolysis are then converted directly to biodiesel via base-catalyzed transesterification. Also, glycerolysis is done at high enough temperatures to completely dry the feed oil before the transesterification process, thus avoiding the formation of excess soaps and the decanting problems that can result.
Over the past decade, glycerolysis has continued to grow in popularity among those companies successful in the industry. For example, recent articles in several industry periodicals have noted that some biodiesel producers have been using glycerolysis successfully for several years (e.g., Renewable Energy Group&rsquo;s Seneca, Ill., plant).
The rate of the glycerolysis reaction is determined by two variables: the initial concentration of FFA and temperature. Many biodiesel plants run their processes using steam heating systems, and are limited to operating temperatures of 350 degrees Fahrenheit or less. Although glycerolysis can be run at these lower temperatures, reaction kinetics are vastly improved when run at temperatures at or above 450 F. However, operating temperatures approaching 500 F are not recommended due to possible glycerin decomposition, forming acrolein.
Some biodiesel producers may not be familiar or comfortable with high-temperature processes, and therefore tend to shy away from the use of thermal oil heating systems needed for glycerolysis operating temperatures. This concern over the use of hot oil systems is due to a lack of industrial experience, particularly with oleochemicals.
Another benefit from glycerolysis is its simplicity. The only reagent needed for successful glycerolysis is glycerin, the byproduct of transesterification. In plants using glycerolysis, the glycerin produced during transesterification can be recycled back into the process, and the excess glycerin can be refined for sale as a valuable byproduct.
Research at Superior Process Technologies was done to compare glycerolysis at various operational temperatures. Multiple laboratory batch-wise glycerolysis reactions were performed on brown grease at 350 F and 460 F, representing steam-heated and thermal-oil-heated systems. The lab work and data analysis was performed by Chris Sorensen with SPT. Samples were taken over the course of the reaction and run on a Gas Chromatograph-Flame Ionization Detector to determine compositional makeup versus reaction time. The initial brown grease was determined to have an acid number of 100 (with 50 percent FFA) via wet chemistry titration prior to glycerolysis. Each batch was brought up to their respective temperatures under inert conditions using a nitrogen purge before charging glycerin. Eight batches were run in total at varying temperatures and FFA concentrations. By graphing the average acid numbers versus time of each reaction, the difference in the rate of FFA reduction can be seen in Figure 1.
At 460 F, the FFA concentration is lowered rapidly in the first hour, and well below 1 percent FFA within several hours. In comparison, the reaction at 350 F did lower the FFA below 2 percent, but required nine hours of reaction time. Clearly, the main cause for the observed slower reaction rate is the lower reaction temperature.
Another contributing factor that may affect reaction kinetics is the system&rsquo;s ability to purge water out at 350 F compared to 460 F. Kirk Cobb, senior process engineer at SPT, points out that any residual mole fraction of water remaining in the reaction liquid may restrict the chemical kinetics at the end of the reaction. It was noted in the lab data that the 350 F batches could never quite reduce the remaining FFA below 1 percent, as the higher temperature batches were able to do. Any remaining water shifts the steady-state equilibrium slightly towards the reactants&rsquo; side of the equation, slowing the reaction. One solution to the problem of any remaining traces of water is to place the system under vacuum. At negative pressures, the water will be more effectively driven out, and an increase in the system kinetics can be achieved. The drawback to this approach is that there is a fine line between removing water and removing free glycerin, even at 350 F. Also, if vacuum leaks were to occur at glycerolysis temperatures, any air in the system can cause oxidation of the oil. An alternative is to run the reactions at atmospheric pressure, but use nitrogen to purge any water vapor. In large-scale, continuous glycerolysis operations, a combination of heat and nitrogen purging can be used with great success.
Combining glycerin with oils containing FFA, while heating, appears to result in three primary reactions shown in Figure 2.
The reaction of FFA and glycerin to form monoglycerides and water is initially the primary reaction (R1) during glycerolysis; this reaction is responsible for the majority of FFA reduction. A secondary reaction (R2) between glycerin and triglycerides forms mono- and diglycerides; one mole of triglyceride will react with one mole of free glycerin to form one mole each of mono- and diglyceride. A third reaction (R3) is the combination of FFA with monoglycerides to form diglycerides and water; this reaction may become dominant later in the system as monoglyceride concentrations increase, and free glycerin concentration diminishes with time.
The oil composition for FFA, free glycerin, monoglycerides, diglycerides and triglycerides was determined using GC-FID. This data was analyzed to determine the rate constant, K, for each of these three competing reactions, as shown in Figure 3.
The &ldquo;rate constant&rdquo; is a number that quantifies the speed of the reaction and is dependent only on temperature. The larger the K value, the faster that reaction. The actual laboratory data was modeled mathematically to determine the K values shown in Figure 3. Although the K value in each case is only a function of temperature, the total rate of reaction for each of these reactions is also dependent on the concentration of the reactants. Early in the batch reaction when FFA and free glycerin are relatively high, the R1 and R2 reactions will dominate; but as monoglyceride concentrations increase over time, the R3 reaction may begin to dominate the final consumption of FFA. All three of these reactions occur during high-temperature glycerolysis at different rates, and reach different states of equilibrium.
Figure 3 shows how the K values for glycerolysis at 350 F were significantly lower than the K values at 460 F.
One point of interest in Figure 3 is that, at 460 F, the rate constant of Reaction R3 (K=1.47) is almost as high as Reaction R1 (K=1.56). A possible explanation for the similar reaction rates observed is that monoglycerides, like free glycerin, have readily available alcohol groups that can react with FFA, with minimal steric hindrance. The results suggest that FFA does not discern much of a difference between bonding with glycerin or monoglycerides. &nbsp;
The K values for each of the reactions were determined using the compositional data at 350 F (Figure 4) and 460 F (Figure 5). Glycerolysis at 460 F reaches an equilibrium state within one to two hours, while the reaction at 350 F (steam temperatures) continues well beyond five hours. At 350 F, the composition of the oil follows the same trends as glycerolysis at 460 F, just at a slower rate. After a long enough timeline, both batch reactions might eventually produce the same results. The benefit of the higher-temperature glycerolysis becomes apparent when designing a full-scale biodiesel plant. In order to be able to transfer this process data from a batch system to a large-scale continuous system, understanding and accounting for the different reaction kinetics is essential. By increasing the rate of the reaction at the higher operating temperature, biodiesel manufacturers would be able to convert larger volumes of high-FFA oils to biodiesel at less expense. &nbsp; &nbsp;
Whether glycerolysis is performed at 350 or 460 F, the end products are essentially the same. Both contain high mole fractions of mono- and diglycerides along with lowered levels of FFA, and some remaining triglycerides and free glycerin. Glycerolysis at the high temperature has the added benefit of lowering FFA concentrations significantly faster. When scaled up to a continuous system, running glycerolysis at 460 F instead of 350 F will result in at least three times the amount of throughput, while producing an almost completely dry product. The end result is dry, glyceride-rich oil with FFA content below 1 percent. This study was conducted using very low-grade brown grease in order to be conservative on promoting the advantages of glycerolysis. In reality, this process works equally well when using a source of oil like yellow grease, with FFA levels ranging from 5 to 15 percent, although any level of FFA can be glycerized successfully.
The &ldquo;chemical kinetics&rdquo; results of this laboratory batch study have been successfully used to scale up the glycerolysis process to a continuous, industrial design. Readers of this article, who are interested in taking advantage of the glycerolysis process for biodiesel feed oil pretreatment, are encouraged to contact us.
Author: Erik Anderson Laboratory Manager, Superior Process Technologies 612-378-0800 x5 <a href="mailto:eanderson@superiorpt.com">eanderson@superiorpt.com</a>

LAB ANALYSIS: Chris Sorensen with Superior Process Technologies performed lab work and data analysis comparing glycerolysis at various operational temperatures. Multiple laboratory batch-wise glycerolysis reactions were performed  on brown grease. 

2014/05/BOB-Biodiesel-hood-0514_1400095498457_largethumb.jpg

2014/05/BOB-Biodiesel-hood-0514_1400095498457_thumb.jpg

2014/05/BOB-Biodiesel-hood-0514_1400095498457.jpg

ALTERNATIVE APPROACH: Glycerolysis involves recycling glycerin to the front of the biodiesel process, where it is reacted with free fatty acids to make fatty acid methyl esters. It is one alternative to acid esterification. 

2014/05/BOB-Biodiesel-GAB1-0514_14000954848643.jpg

Figure 2 â€“ The three primary reactions modeled for glycerolysis

2014/05/BDM-MayJune14-35b_14000958255919.jpg

Figure 1 â€“ Comparing Glycerolysis Rates of Reaction: %FFA vs. Time at 350 F and 460 F

2014/05/Figure-1-Glycerolysis-Contribution_14000955010148.jpg

Figure 3 â€“ â€œKâ€� values for competing Glycerolysis Reactions at 350 and 460 F

2014/05/BDM-MayJune14-35_14000956975672.jpg

SCALE-UP LESSON: Superior Process Technologies' analysis of glycerolysis at varying temperatures shows that the benefits of higher-temperature processing becomes apparent when designing a full-scale plant. 

2014/05/BOB-Biodiesel-GAB2-0514_14000959503506.jpg

Figure 4 â€“ Glycerolysis system components vs. time, at 350 F

2014/05/Figure-4-Glycerolysis-Contribution_14000959526031.jpg

Figure 5 - Glycerolysis system components vs. time, at 460 F

2014/05/Figure-5-Glycerolysis-Contribution_14000959545431.jpg

Glycerolysis on high-FFA, low-grade feedstock at varying temperatures will result in the same end product, but higher heat will triple throughput. 

May/June 2014

Business Briefs

Business Briefs

Columns

THE FEEDSTOCK ISSUE

Sustainable Feedstock Contracts

A True Masterpiece: Feedstock Diversity and Biodiesel's Carbon Story

The Secret to Effective Lobbying

Featured

The Myth & Reality of Biodiesel Feedstock Availability

Time Has Come Today

Contributions

The Chemical Kinetics of Glycerolysis

May/June 2014.css-7jxktu{position:absolute;bottom:0px;left:0px;right:0px;height:3px;border-radius:3px;background-color:var(--chakra-colors-brandBlack);}

Business Briefs

Business Briefs

Columns

THE FEEDSTOCK ISSUE

Sustainable Feedstock Contracts

A True Masterpiece: Feedstock Diversity and Biodiesel's Carbon Story

The Secret to Effective Lobbying

Featured

The Myth & Reality of Biodiesel Feedstock Availability

Time Has Come Today

Contributions

The Chemical Kinetics of Glycerolysis

May/June 2014