EPA asks Supreme Court to delay SRE lawsuit

January 30, 2025

BY Erin Voegele

The Trump administration has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to pause the small refinery exemption (SRE) lawsuit currently pending before the court while the agency “reassesses the basis for and the soundness of the denial actions.”

The case pertains to U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit’s November 2023 decision related to the administration of SREs under the Renewable Fuel Standard.  

The U.S. EPA in April 2022 denied 36 SREs that had been filed under the RFS. The agency in June 2022 denied an additional 69 additional SRE petitions. Those SRE petitions had been filed by 36 small refineries located in 18 states. 

Advertisement

Numerous refineries challenged the denials in the Third, Fifth, Seventh, Ninth, Tenth, Eleventh, and D.C. Circuit Courts. All regional circuits except the Fifth Circuit concluded that only the D.C. Circuit was the proper venue to hear the challenges and either dismissed or transferred the challenges to the D.C. Circuit. The Fifth Circuit Court, however, denied EPA’s request to transfer the challenges to the D.C. Circuit court, holding that the SRE denials were “locally or regionally applicable” rather than “national applicable.” The Fifth Circuit Court proceeded with the challenges and in November 2023 ruled in favor of the small refineries, remanding six SRE petitions to the EPA for reconsideration. Biofuel groups submitted requests for rehearings with the court, which were ultimately denied. 

Growth Energy and the Renewable Fuels Association in May 2024 jointly petitioned the Supreme Court to overturn the Fifth Circuit’s decision. In their petition, Growth Energy and RFA argued that challenges to those denials should be adjudicated solely in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, not in regional circuits like the Fifth, which only covers Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas. In contrast to all other U.S. Courts of Appeals that evaluated this venue issue, the Fifth Circuit concluded that it was the proper venue to hear and rule on these challenges, despite the fact that EPA’s SRE policy is “nationally applicable” and “based on a determination of nationwide scope or effect.” 

The Supreme Court on Oct. 21, 2024, announced it would take up the case. The case is currently ongoing, with reply briefs for the petitioner and respondents supporting the petitioner due Feb. 20. The case has not yet been scheduled for argument. 

Advertisement

“After the change in Administration, EPA’s Acting Administrator has determined that the agency should reassess the basis for and soundness of the underlying denial actions. Such a reassessment could obviate the need for this Court to determine the proper venue for challenges to those actions… Given the Acting Administrator’s determination, it would be appropriate for the Court to hold further proceedings in this case in abeyance to allow for EPA to reassess the basis for and soundness of the denial actions.,” the EPA wrote in a Jan. 24 motion filed with the court. 

Growth Energy and the RFA on Jan. 27 filed a response with the court opposing the EPA’s motion to pause proceedings on the case.   

“EPA’s statement that it wishes to reassess the basis for and soundness of the underlying denial actions changes nothing about the status of this case,” the biofuel groups wrote. “Before this Court granted certiorari, the court below had already vacated the denial actions and remanded them to EPA for reconsideration, as had the D.C. Circuit in a separate case. Thus, this Court granted certiorari knowing that EPA was already bound to reassess the basis for and soundness of the underlying denial actions. The possibility that EPA would issue revised actions on the exemption petitions while this case was pending— and might even reverse course and grant the petitions—rightly did not deter the Court from granting certiorari because the question presented does not relate to the basis for or soundness of the underlying denial actions. The Court’s judgment remains sound.”

Full copies of the EPA’s motion and the response filed by RFA and Growth Energy are available on the Supreme Court website.

Related Stories

More than 1.76 billion renewable identification numbers (RINs) were generated under the Renewable Fuel Standard in January, down from 1.91 billion generated during the same period of 2024, according to data released by the U.S. EPA on Feb. 20.

Read More

The U.S. EPA on Feb. 20 released updated small refinery exemption (SRE) data showing that 13 previously denied SRE petitions for Renewable Fuel Standard compliance years 2021 and 2022 are being reconsidered. No new SRE petitions were filed.

Read More

A coalition of biofuel, agriculture, fuel retailer and petroleum trade groups on Feb. 19 sent a letter to U.S. EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin urging the agency to set robust, timely, multiyear RFS RVOs for 2026 and beyond.

Read More

CVR Energy Inc. released fourth quarter financial results on Feb. 18, reporting reduced renewable diesel production. The company also said it is pausing development of SAF capacity pending clarity on government subsidies.

Read More

CARB on Feb. 18 announced that amendments to its LCFS program that were approved in November 2024 have been put on hold following the California Office of Administrative Law’s decision to disapprove the amendments due to clarity issues.

Read More

Upcoming Events

Sign up for our e-newsletter!

Advertisement

Advertisement