Biofuel, ag groups express disappointment in court’s SRE decision

November 28, 2023

BY Erin Krueger

A coalition of biofuel and farm groups on Nov. 27 released a statement expressing disappointment in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals' Nov. 22 decision remanding to the U.S. EPA six small refinery exemption (SRE) requests. The coalition, which includes the Renewable Fuels Association, Growth Energy, American Coalition for Ethanol and National Farmers Union, said it will continue to defend the Renewable Fuel Standard.  

Six small refineries in 2022 filed petitions with the court challenging the EPA’s denial of their SRE petitions. The agency in December 2021 proposed to deny more than 60 SRE petitions filed by small refineries seeking exemptions from RFS blending requirements for one or more compliance years between 2016 and 2021. At that time, the EPA said its decision to deny those SREs was based on results from its review of the pending SRE petitions and supporting information, its legal, technical and policy analysis of the Clean Air Act provisions related to small refineries, and its application of the holding of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in Renewable Fuels Association et al. v. EPA. The proposed denials were finalized in 2022.

In its ruling, the court said the petitioners’ SREs were denied by the EPA using a “novel CAA interpretation and economic theory that the agency published in December 2021.” The court concluded that the denials were “impermissibly retroactive,” “contrary to law,” and “counter to the record evidence.” 

Advertisement

“While we are disappointed by this decision, we will continue to vigilantly defend the Renewable Fuel Standard and fight against the illegal abuse of small refinery exemptions,” the RFA, Growth Energy, ACE and NFU said in their statement. “As other Federal courts have determined, the RFS does not impose an economic burden on oil refiners because any compliance costs are passed down the supply chain. All refiners—regardless of their size or location—face equitable RFS obligations, and all of them pass through their costs to comply. This lawsuit was never really about purported economic hardship; rather, it was about a handful of entrenched oil refineries doing everything they can to dodge their legal obligations to blend renewable fuels and block consumer access to lower-cost, lower-carbon options at the pump.”

Advertisement

Related Stories

President Trump on July 4 signed the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act.” The legislation extends and updates the 45Z credit and revives a tax credit benefiting small biodiesel producers but repeals several other bioenergy-related tax incentives.

Read More

CARB on June 27 announced amendments to the state’s LCFS regulations will take effect beginning on July 1. The amended regulations were approved by the agency in November 2024, but implementation was delayed due to regulatory clarity issues.

Read More

SAF Magazine and the Commercial Aviation Alternative Fuels Initiative announced the preliminary agenda for the North American SAF Conference and Expo, being held Sept. 22-24 at the Minneapolis Convention Center in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Read More

International Sustainability & Carbon Certification has announced that Environment and Climate Change Canada has approved ISCC as a certification scheme in line with its sustainability criteria under its Clean Fuel Regulations.

Read More

Legislation introduced in the California Senate on June 23 aims to cap the price of Low Carbon Fuel Standard credits as part of a larger effort to overhaul the state’s fuel regulations and mitigate rising gas prices.

Read More

Upcoming Events

Sign up for our e-newsletter!

Advertisement

Advertisement