EU experts debate shortcomings of ILUC factors, calculations
Photo: Technical University of Berlin
May 16, 2013
BY The European Biodiesel Board
Last week at the European Parliament on the evaluation of indirect land use change (ILUC) and life cycle assessment (LCA), Prof. Matthias Finkbeiner, Chair of Sustainable Engineering and Vice-Director of Environmental Technology at Technical University of Berlin, warned against strong uncertainty surrounding economic modeling, highlighting that “there is broad consensus in the scientific community that the current ILUC estimations are misleading.”
In his recent study, comparing scientific robustness of ILUC models and their consistency with international GHG emission calculation standards, Finkbeiner provides a broad overview of loopholes and weaknesses that put reliance on estimated ILUC factors’ use for policy-making into question. Among others, the study concludes that:
-ILUC modeling is highly uncertain due to the immaturity of the discipline
-there are systematic and structural deficiencies in the models
Advertisement
-macroeconomic models remain nontransparent and are merely based on assumptions as regards use of land data and land use activity, understanding of regional characteristics and production of coproducts
-none of the relevant international standards on the use of LCA and carbon foot printing are compatible with the inclusion of ILUC factors
-the ranges of ILUC values found in the existing literature vary enormously, indicating that ILUC factors are an inappropriate tool for decision-making
Advertisement
-focus and efforts should be directed towards a proactive mitigation strategy for improving agricultural practices, especially in nonEU countries
Prof. André Faaij, from Copernicus Institute for Sustainable Development of the Utrecht University, stated that it would make more sense to prefer a regionalized approach based on increased efficiency in agriculture throughout the supply chain and good governance of land use at the sourcing regions, while integrating food, feed and fuel production. “ILUC is a reactive concept while we actually want to be proactive,” Faaij said. “Defining ILUC factors has received the most attention, but very limited focus is put on the mitigation of ILUC.” ILUC factors do not stimulate good practices, which can combine better and more efficient and sustainable farming with improved availability of land for biomass production. Such an approach would avoid conflicts with food supplies and other land uses, including the occurrence of ILUC.
Against this background, the European Biodiesel Board and the EU Vegetable Oil and Protein Meal Industry (FEDIOL) welcome the draft report published by MEP Vidal Quadras, Rapporteur for the EP Industry and Energy Committee, which seeks pragmatic ILUC mitigation practices while safeguarding existing and future investments.
The commission legislative proposal, based on uncertain ILUC factors, would only put green investments and the emergence of an EU bioeconomy into jeopardy, while threatening investor confidence at a time of economic crisis.
Related Stories
The U.S. Department of Commerce has disbanded an advisory committee that provided the agency with private sector advice aimed at boosting the competitiveness of U.S. renewable energy and energy efficiency exports, including ethanol and wood pellets.
Iowa’s Renewable Fuels Infrastructure Program on March 25 awarded nearly $3 million in grants to support the addition of E15 at 111 retail sites. The program also awarded grants to support two biodiesel infrastructure projects.
U.S. operatable biofuels capacity increased slightly in January, with gains for ethanol, according to the U.S. EIA’s Monthly Biofuels Capacity and Feedstock Update, released March 31. Feedstock consumption was down when compared to December.
Effective April 1, Illinois’ biodiesel blend requirements have increased from B14 to B17. The increase was implemented via a bipartisan bill passed in 2022, according to the Iowa Soybean Association.
U.S. farmers are expected to plant 83.5 million acres of soybeans in 2025, down 4% when compared to last year, according to the USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service’s annual Prospective Plantings report, released March 31.
Upcoming Events
