Clean Fuels Alliance America expressed disappointment in the California Air Resources Board’s recently&nbsp;<a href="https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/barcu/regact/2024/lcfs2024/15day_notice.pdf">proposed amendments</a>&nbsp;to its Low Carbon Fuel Standard. If adopted, these changes would impose caps on credits for soy- and canola-based biodiesel and renewable diesel, without sufficient scientific evidence to support such limitations.By restricting credit generation for these low-carbon alternatives, CARB risks unfairly disadvantaging biodiesel and renewable diesel—proven solutions that reduce emissions today while supporting sustainable farming and rural economies. Limiting biodiesel and renewable diesel in favor of technologies that will not be fully scalable for many years, even by CARB’s own projections, threatens both environmental progress and innovation.Biodiesel and renewable diesel have significantly contributed to California’s emissions reductions. Based on&nbsp;<a href="https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/documents/lcfs-data-dashboard">data</a>&nbsp;from CARB, last year more than 3 billion pounds of soybean oil and 1.7 billion pounds of canola oil were used in the state, with biomass-based diesel (BMBD) now accounting for 73% of California’s diesel pool.“These proposed amendments impose significant restrictions on vegetable oil feedstocks, hindering the ability of clean fuels to effectively decarbonize the heavy-duty transportation sector. Moreover, they introduce stricter standards for these fuels than those applied to others, including petroleum,” said&nbsp;<a href="https://cleanfuels.org/person/jeff-earl/">Jeff Earl</a>, director of state governmental affairs at Clean Fuels. “These changes unjustly penalize biodiesel and renewable diesel—low-carbon fuels that provide immediate health benefits for California.”Clean Fuels will submit comments strongly urging CARB to reconsider these amendments that threaten to reverse progress in emissions reductions and jeopardize the economic viability of renewable fuels.“We believe that collaboration and sound science are crucial to advancing environmental goals without compromising the livelihoods of those who have committed to sustainable energy and rural communities,” said&nbsp;<a href="https://cleanfuels.org/person/donnell-rehagen/">Donnell Rehagen</a>, CEO at Clean Fuels. “Without a robust scientific foundation, these vegetable oil caps, and additional sustainability requirements threaten to undo the progress of our industry.”The deadline for public comment is Aug. 27, 2024.&nbsp;

2024-08-21 - Clean Fuels expresses disappointment in CARB’s LCFS proposal (2 publications)

thumbnail_CFAALogo_16886009220804-300x300-noup.jpg

CFAALogo_16886009220804-300x300-noup.jpg

Clean Fuels Alliance America is disappointed in proposed changes to California’s LCFS that would impose caps on credits for soy- and canola-based biodiesel and renewable diesel, without sufficient scientific evidence to support such limitations.

Clean Fuels expresses disappointment in CARB’s LCFS proposal

Related Stories

Senate version of “big, beautiful bill” aims to extend, alter 45Z tax credit

California bill aims to expedite development of up to 3 SAF projects

EPA releases proposed rule to set 2026, 2027 RFS RVOs, make significant changes to RFS program

EPA revises 2024 cellulosic RVO to 1.1 billion RINs

White House OMB completes review of 2 RFS rules

Upcoming Events

North American SAF Conference & Expo

2026 International Biomass Conference & Expo

Clean Fuels expresses disappointment in CARB’s LCFS proposal.css-7jxktu{position:absolute;bottom:0px;left:0px;right:0px;height:3px;border-radius:3px;background-color:var(--chakra-colors-brandBlack);}